Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
posted by hubie on Wednesday October 16 2024, @01:01PM   Printer-friendly
from the if-a-kessler-syndrome-is-not-triggered-first dept.

Charlie Stross, a science fiction writer based in Scotland, has written a post about different possible approaches to space colonization. He includes a discussion of several different models.

While the strong form of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis is evidently invalid, a weaker version—that language influences thought—is much harder to argue against. When we talk about a spaceship, a portmanteau word derived from "[outer] space" and "ship", we bring along certain unstated assumptions about shipping that are at odds with the physical parameters of a human-friendly life support environment for traversing interplanetary distances. Ships, in the vernacular, have captains and a crew who obey the captain via a chain of command, they carry cargo or passengers, they travel between ports or to a well-defined destination, they may have a mission whether it be scientific research or military. And of these aspects, only the scientific research angle is remotely applicable to any actually existing interplanetary vehicle, be it a robot probe like Psyche or one of the Apollo program flights.

(Pedant's footnote: while the Apollo crews had a nominal commander, actual direction came from Mission Control back on Earth and the astronauts operated as a team, along lines very similar to those later formalized as Crew Resource Management in commercial aviation.)

Anyway, a point I've already chewed over on this blog is that a spaceship is not like a sea-going vessel, can't be operated like a sea-going vessel, and the word "ship" in its name feeds into various cognitive biases that may be actively harmful to understanding what it is.

Which leads me to the similar term "space colony": the word colony drags in all sorts of historical baggage, and indeed invokes several models of how an off-Earth outpost might operate, all of which invoke very dangerous cognitive biases!

There are few more models which he missed.

Previously:
(2022) Moon Life 2030
(2022) Why Werner Herzog Thinks Human Space Colonization "Will Inevitably Fail"
(2020) Elon Musk Will Run Into Trouble Setting Up a Martian Government, Lawyers Say
(2018) Who Owns The Moon? A Space Lawyer Answers
(2017) Stephen Hawking Urges Nations to Pursue Lunar Base and Mars Landing
(2015) NASA Working on 3D Printers to Print Objects Using Martian Regolith


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday October 17 2024, @06:03PM (1 child)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday October 17 2024, @06:03PM (#1377434) Journal

    However, I consider it a colossal waste of money, time and resources to have projects to send humans to gravity wells like Mars.

    Gravity wells have things like ground, free gravity (less need to rotate things), and aerobraking.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 18 2024, @02:31AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 18 2024, @02:31AM (#1377520)
    The scientific experiments haven't been done to prove that the gravity on Mars is good enough for humans and our preferred animals etc. If it turns out to not be enough it's harder to get the "correct gravity" in a gravity well.

    Whereas you're going to need the artificial gravity tech anyway for future space colonies, so might as well start on it now while fossil fuels etc are still relatively cheap and available.

    You're also going to need to do the science on "how much gravity is good enough for humans/chickens/fish/etc)".

    Doing "humans on Mars" first is wasting resources doing the wrong thing first.

    The advantage of doing Mars first is it gets the stupid and ignorant masses more excited.