Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by mrpg on Monday October 21 2024, @11:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the so-long... dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

It has been claimed that fish farming is a sustainable source of food that will help us feed the growing global human population while protecting wild fish populations – but this isn’t true.

“Fish farming is not a substitute for catching wild fish out of the ocean,” says Matthew Hayek at New York University. “In fact, it relies on catching wild fish out of the ocean.”

Hayek and his colleagues have shown that the amount of wild fish killed in order to feed farmed fish is between 27 and 307 per cent higher than previous estimates.

Farmed carnivorous fish eat multiple times more weight in wild fish caught from the ocean than is obtained by farming them, says Hayek. For instance, producing a kilogram of salmon may require 4 or 5 kilograms of wild fish.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by mrpg (5708) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 22 2024, @12:55AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday October 22 2024, @12:55AM (#1378036)

    I smell lots of BS and FUD. The title itself is bullshit: "Why farming fish is more unsustainable than catching them in the wild"

    Farmed carnivorous fish eat multiple times more weight in wild fish caught from the ocean than is obtained by farming them, says Hayek. For instance, producing a kilogram of salmon may require 4 or 5 kilograms of wild fish.

    And if you buy 1 kilo of wild salmon, how many kilograms of wild fish did it take to produce your kilo of wild salmon? Hey fool, what the f*ck do you think wild salmon eat? Potatoes?

    “Fish farming is not a substitute for catching wild fish out of the ocean,” says Matthew Hayek at New York University. “In fact, it relies on catching wild fish out of the ocean.”

    Farmed fish are a lot less fussy over the sorts of wild fish they eat compared to humans. So you waste less wild fish if you are fishing to produce fish feed, than if you are fishing to feed humans directly ( in some cases bycatch can be up to 20kg thrown away for every 1kg kept! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bycatch#Shrimp_trawling [wikipedia.org] )

    Also fish feed is not 100% wild fish.

    Feeding humans via fish farming can definitely be more sustainable than feeding humans via fishing.

    It's a lot easier to feed a billion humans with farmed chicken/pigs than to trap and hunt wild pigs and chickens in jungles (or worse do the equivalent of trawling, like clearcut the jungle). And while you still damage the environment, you damage it a lot less.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Tuesday October 22 2024, @04:18AM

    by Reziac (2489) on Tuesday October 22 2024, @04:18AM (#1378052) Homepage

    Exactly. BS and FUD.

    As if the fish-we-plan-to-eat wouldn't eat the same number of other fish in the wild?? Actually, as you say, a whole lot more of them.

    Besides, farmed-fish food (at least in the US) isn't wild-caught fish as such. It's the pelleted byproducts from human food production, mostly slaughter waste from other critters (including wildcaught fish that are processed for human consumption, so it actually uses what humans would otherwise waste).

    https://www.purinamills.com/products/fish-and-aquatics-feed [purinamills.com]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commercial_fish_feed#Sustainability [wikipedia.org]

    --
    And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.