Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Monday October 21 2024, @11:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the so-long... dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

It has been claimed that fish farming is a sustainable source of food that will help us feed the growing global human population while protecting wild fish populations – but this isn’t true.

“Fish farming is not a substitute for catching wild fish out of the ocean,” says Matthew Hayek at New York University. “In fact, it relies on catching wild fish out of the ocean.”

Hayek and his colleagues have shown that the amount of wild fish killed in order to feed farmed fish is between 27 and 307 per cent higher than previous estimates.

Farmed carnivorous fish eat multiple times more weight in wild fish caught from the ocean than is obtained by farming them, says Hayek. For instance, producing a kilogram of salmon may require 4 or 5 kilograms of wild fish.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by mrpg (5708) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Wednesday October 23 2024, @07:31AM (1 child)

    by Reziac (2489) on Wednesday October 23 2024, @07:31AM (#1378243) Homepage

    Actually, crops are much more profitable, acre for acre, than even primo beef. That's why pretty much everywhere that can be reasonably farmed already is, and grazing is mostly marginal land that's either too poor of soil or too dry or too steep or some other no-go problem for modern tractors. That's also why we irrigate so much cropland that otherwise would only be good for grazing.(Like, close to 100% of California's crops.)

    An awful lot of grazing land is several acres per cow-calf pair. That's about $500/year of gross income. If the same land could be put in, say, wheat, it would be about 5x more profitable.

    --
    And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Wednesday October 23 2024, @12:41PM

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Wednesday October 23 2024, @12:41PM (#1378281)

    I have a skewed perspective on grazing land, here in Florida. Grazing land here is quite valuable for other purposes. It's interchangeable with citrus groves, suburban development, and many commercial crops.

    The Lykes brothers' ranch around Fish eating creek was over 50,000 acres of highly valuable land that became embroiled in political wrangling for conservation and development. Many other old family ranches in Florida are similar, run as cow-calf operations by families more interested in preserving their rancher lifestyle/heritage than making profit, they already have more money than they need.

    --
    🌻🌻🌻 [google.com]