Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:
In a step toward new types of particle physics experiments, scientists cooled and then accelerated a beam of muons. The subatomic particles, heavy cousins of electrons, could be accelerated and slammed together at future particle colliders in hopes of unlocking physics secrets. But first, scientists have to figure out how to give muons a speed boost.
Counterintuitively, that means first slowing muons down. Muons in particle beams initially go every which way. To make a beam suitable for experiments, the particles need to be first slowed and then reaccelerated, all in the same direction. This slowing, or cooling, was first demonstrated in 2020 (SN: 2/5/20).
[...] The scientists first sent the muons into an aerogel, a lightweight material that slowed the muons and created muonium, an atomlike combination of a positively charged muon and a negatively charged electron. Next, a laser stripped away the electrons, leaving behind cooled muons that electromagnetic fields then accelerated.
Muon colliders could generate higher energy collisions than machines that smash protons, which are themselves made up of smaller particles called quarks. Each proton’s energy is divvied up among its quarks, meaning only part of the energy goes into the collision. Muons have no smaller bits inside. And they’re preferable to electrons, which lose energy as they circle an accelerator. Muons aren’t as affected by that issue thanks to their larger mass.
S. Aritome et al. Acceleration of positive muons by a radio-frequency cavity. arXiv:2410.11367. Submitted October 15, 2024.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday November 18 2024, @06:29PM (3 children)
I don't really get why you linked to that whining person. I got half way through the first video before giving up, but as far as I could tell she got a science job with a crappy boss and thus science is evil. Or something.
ps: Don't forget to buy her book!
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday November 18 2024, @11:25PM (2 children)
The thing is, that environment breeds crappy bosses. She's telling a lot of truth here. It's a lot easier (once you pass the high bar to get tenure) to come up with a comfortable niche, crank out a few papers to prime the funding pump, then sic your minions (graduate students and post-grads) on generating the results you need to keep the pump going (or in her example, fixing up the next edition of the book the prof supposedly authored).
It wouldn't be such a big deal, if funding meant great research. Instead it merely means theater.
(Score: 2) by PiMuNu on Wednesday November 20 2024, @02:11PM (1 child)
Crap bosses exist everywhere.
Capitalism breeds crappy MBA types trying to get ahead by being clueless.
Socialism breeds crappy bureaucratic micro managers trying to get ahead.
Academia breeds crappy do-nothings trying to suck everyone else's results out into their own paper.
Crap people are crap and exist everywhere in life. I don't see that academia is better or worse.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Friday November 22 2024, @03:02AM