Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:
In a step toward new types of particle physics experiments, scientists cooled and then accelerated a beam of muons. The subatomic particles, heavy cousins of electrons, could be accelerated and slammed together at future particle colliders in hopes of unlocking physics secrets. But first, scientists have to figure out how to give muons a speed boost.
Counterintuitively, that means first slowing muons down. Muons in particle beams initially go every which way. To make a beam suitable for experiments, the particles need to be first slowed and then reaccelerated, all in the same direction. This slowing, or cooling, was first demonstrated in 2020 (SN: 2/5/20).
[...] The scientists first sent the muons into an aerogel, a lightweight material that slowed the muons and created muonium, an atomlike combination of a positively charged muon and a negatively charged electron. Next, a laser stripped away the electrons, leaving behind cooled muons that electromagnetic fields then accelerated.
Muon colliders could generate higher energy collisions than machines that smash protons, which are themselves made up of smaller particles called quarks. Each proton’s energy is divvied up among its quarks, meaning only part of the energy goes into the collision. Muons have no smaller bits inside. And they’re preferable to electrons, which lose energy as they circle an accelerator. Muons aren’t as affected by that issue thanks to their larger mass.
S. Aritome et al. Acceleration of positive muons by a radio-frequency cavity. arXiv:2410.11367. Submitted October 15, 2024.
(Score: 2) by The Vocal Minority on Tuesday November 19 2024, @10:38AM
Or people could just watch the original videos and decide for themselves. I watched the first video your man covers, and in it Sabine has some criticisms of the academy that are pretty common - the hyper-focus on commercial outcomes vs pure research, managerialism, and bullying. I've seen some of these play out myself to no good effect. Hardly controversial.
I think that there are some legitimate criticisms in the video you linked to concerning audience capture and click bait titles, but this attitude that the academy is pure and noble, and we can't say anything bad about it because those scruffy lay people will become science deniers is just so insufferable (to say the least).