Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday February 25 2015, @04:56PM   Printer-friendly
from the it-could-be-used-to-make,-well,-anything! dept.

FedEx is refusing to ship Texas nonprofit Defense Distributed's computer controlled mill, the Ghost Gunner. The $1,500 tool can carve aluminum objects from digital designs, including AR-15 lower receivers from scratch or more quickly from legally obtainable "80 percent lowers".

When the machine was revealed last October, Defense Distributed's pre-orders sold out in 36 hours. But now FedEx tells WIRED it's too wary of the legal issues around homemade gunsmithing to ship the machine to customers. "This device is capable of manufacturing firearms, and potentially by private individuals," FedEx spokesperson Scott Fiedler wrote in a statement. "We are uncertain at this time whether this device is a regulated commodity by local, state or federal governments. As such, to ensure we comply with the applicable law and regulations, FedEx declined to ship this device until we know more about how it will be regulated."

But buying, selling, or using the Ghost Gunner isn't illegal, nor is owning an AR-15 without a serial number, says Adam Winkler, a law professor at UCLA and the author of Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America. "This is not that problematic," he says. "Federal law does not prohibit individuals from making their own firearms at home, and that includes AR-15s."

Defense Distributed's founder Cody Wilson argues that rather than a legal ambiguity, FedEx is instead facing up to the political gray area of enabling the sale of new, easily accessible tools that can make anything-including deadly weapons. "They're acting like this is legal when in fact it's the expression of a political preference," says Wilson. "The artifact that they're shipping is a CNC mill. There's nothing about it that is specifically related to firearms except the hocus pocus of the marketing." Wilson, whose radically libertarian group has pursued projects ranging from 3-D printed guns to untraceable cryptocurrency, says he chose to ship his Ghost Gunner machines with FedEx specifically because the company has a special NRA firearm industry membership. But when he told a local FedEx representative what he'd be shipping, he says the sales rep responded that he'd need to check with a superior. "This is no big deal, right? It's just a mill," Wilson says he told his FedEx contact. "You guys ship guns. You've shipped 3-D printers and mills, right? You'll ship a drill press, right? Same difference."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by schad on Wednesday February 25 2015, @05:42PM

    by schad (2398) on Wednesday February 25 2015, @05:42PM (#149597)

    Do you actually really, truly believe FedEx's story? This is a CNC mill. While this particular one is being shipped for the primary purpose of making AR15 lower receivers, it's not limited to that. It can make anything you can make on a similar-sized CNC mill. FedEx probably ships at least a couple hundred garden-variety CNC mills every year.

    No, this is plainly legal. FedEx is just terrified that, as the resident corporate behemoth with deep pockets, they're the ones who'll end up in the crosshairs. Just as Obama has decided never to allow Keystone XL to happen and is using bureaucracy to make it seem otherwise, FedEx has decided never to ship the Ghost Gunner and is using the government as cover. I don't have a problem with their decision, honestly. It's their company and they can ship, or not ship, what they want. I have a problem with their cowardly refusal to admit it.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by physicsmajor on Wednesday February 25 2015, @06:56PM

    by physicsmajor (1471) on Wednesday February 25 2015, @06:56PM (#149633)

    Actually, truly? No, I don't buy it. I am very well acquainted with the issues at hand.

    As I said, I am willing to extend them the benefit of the doubt for a limited time. Enough for legal to educate leadership. If they sit on it or refuse for reasons that have no basis in law, then (again, as I said) it'll be time to get inflammatory with justification.