Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday February 25 2015, @07:38PM   Printer-friendly
from the read-all-about-it! dept.

Michael Rosenwald writes in the WaPot that textbook makers, bookstore owners and college student surveys all say millennials still strongly prefer reading on paper for pleasure and learning, a bias that surprises reading experts given the same group’s proclivity to consume most other content digitally. “These are people who aren’t supposed to remember what it’s like to even smell books,” says Naomi S. Baron. “It’s quite astounding.” Earlier this month, Baron published “Words Onscreen: The Fate of Reading in a Digital World,” a book that examines university students’ preferences for print and explains the science of why dead-tree versions are often superior to digital. Her conclusion: readers tend to skim on screens, distraction is inevitable and comprehension suffers. Researchers say readers remember the location of information simply by page and text layout — that, say, the key piece of dialogue was on that page early in the book with that one long paragraph and a smudge on the corner. Researchers think this plays a key role in comprehension - something that is more difficult on screens, primarily because the time we devote to reading online is usually spent scanning and skimming, with few places (or little time) for mental markers.

Another significant problem, especially for college students, is distraction. The lives of millennials are increasingly lived on screens. In her surveys, Baron writes that she found “jaw-dropping” results to the question of whether students were more likely to multitask in hard copy (1 percent) vs. reading on-screen (90 percent). "The explanation is hardly rocket science," says Baron. "When a digital device has an Internet connection, it’s hard to resist the temptation to jump ship: I’ll just respond to that text I heard come in, check the headlines, order those boots that are on sale." “You just get so distracted,” one student says. “It’s like if I finish a paragraph, I’ll go on Tumblr, and then three hours later you’re still not done with reading.”

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by VLM on Wednesday February 25 2015, @08:53PM

    by VLM (445) on Wednesday February 25 2015, @08:53PM (#149686)

    I thought of another example of "innovation" people who don't boardgame LOVE to tell boardgamers how awesome games look on their phone and the future of board gaming is going to be on the phone.

    Meanwhile I got a tournament scale Agricola game going on covering two card tables and I probably need three tables and I'm thinking to myself, and where am I going to find an android phone with a screen that covers three card tables at 100 dpi much less the 600 or so stuff is currently printed at?

    Or Steel Wolves, that needs like an entire room? Even COIN series takes some table real estate? Ever try pathfinder card game with 6 characters, thats like 48 or 52 or whatever piles of cards?

    Also my set of Dominion cards from a decade ago is still playable, but my phone and computer from 2005 isn't working so well... I kinda like the idea I could whip out "Phantom Leader" in 2035 and play if I want.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4