Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Thursday December 12 2024, @11:20PM   Printer-friendly
from the got-gas? dept.

The company's CEO claims that affordable and reliable vehicles with combustion engines are a priority for US buyers:

Mazda is late to the electrification party. The MX-30 is far from being the roaring success the Japanese automaker had hoped it would be. It was axed from the United States at the end of the 2023 model year due to poor sales. The range-extending version with a rotary engine is only offered in certain markets, and the US is not on the list. In addition, the EZ-6 electric sedan isn't coming here either. However, the situation isn't all that bad.

Why? Because Americans primarily want gas cars. Speaking with Automotive News, Mazda CEO Masahiro Moro said ICE has a long future in America. Even at the end of the decade, traditional gas cars and mild-hybrid models will make up about two-thirds of annual sales. Plug-in hybrids and EVs will represent the remaining third. In other words, most vehicles will still have a gas engine five years from now.

Mazda's head honcho primarily referred to entry-level models, specifically the 3 and CX-30. Moro believes EV growth in the US has slowed down in the last 18 months or so, adding the trend will likely continue in the foreseeable future. That buys the company more time to develop a lithium-ion battery entirely in-house. The goal is to have it ready for 2030 in plug-in hybrids and purely electric cars. Expect a much higher energy density and "very short" charging times. Interestingly, the engineers already have a "very advanced research base for solid-state batteries."

In the meantime, work is underway on a two-rotor gas engine that will serve as a generator.

Related:


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Reziac on Friday December 13 2024, @02:50AM (2 children)

    by Reziac (2489) on Friday December 13 2024, @02:50AM (#1385289) Homepage

    That's true. I once did the math on my truck that I had for 34 years, and something like 80% of the cost of ownership was insurance. (No accidents, bottom tier cost.)

    --
    And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13 2024, @05:29AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13 2024, @05:29AM (#1385301)

    Well, insurance by definition is going to cost you more than the price of an oopsie over the long run. Duh. That's how they make their bonuses, as well as denying you claims of course. Duh. What did you think they do?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13 2024, @05:57AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13 2024, @05:57AM (#1385307)

      They got states to mandate you had to have it. "Duh"