Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
posted by hubie on Thursday January 09, @06:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the fact-checking-the-fact-checkers dept.

Facebook, Instagram, and Threads are ditching third-party fact-checkers in favor of a Community Notes program inspired by X, according to an announcement penned by Meta's new Trump-friendly policy chief Joel Kaplan. Meta is also moving its trust and safety teams from California to Texas:

"We've seen this approach work on X – where they empower their community to decide when posts are potentially misleading and need more context, and people across a diverse range of perspectives decide what sort of context is helpful for other users to see." Meta said. "We think this could be a better way of achieving our original intention of providing people with information about what they're seeing – and one that's less prone to bias."

The Community Notes feature will first be rolled out in the US "over the next couple of months" according to Meta, and will display an unobtrusive label indicating that there is additional information available on a post in place of full-screen warnings that users have to click through. Like the X feature, Meta says its own Community Notes will "require agreement between people with a range of perspectives to help prevent biased ratings."

The moderation changes aim to address complaints that Meta censors "too much harmless content" on its platforms, and is slow to respond to users who have their accounts restricted. Meta is also moving its trust and safety teams responsible for its content policies and content reviews content out of California to Texas and other US locations, instead of wholesale moving its California headquarters like Elon Musk did with SpaceX and X.

Also at BBC, MSN and NYP.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by JoeMerchant on Thursday January 09, @10:27PM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Thursday January 09, @10:27PM (#1388149)

    > How is that "95 years after death" going to persuade Jimi Hendrix or The Doors to make any more albums, or for Isaac Asimov to write any more science fiction or fact?

    Because, obviously, that bleeding heart liberal artsy fartsy bunch cares about their children, and grandchildren - much more so than the quarterly bottom line oriented set.

    --
    🌻🌻 [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Saturday January 11, @07:20PM (1 child)

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Saturday January 11, @07:20PM (#1388422) Homepage Journal

    In America, the Constitution gives a valid reason for patent and copyright, quote: "The Congress shall have power: To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries."

    Unlike British copyright (Lawrence Lessig's Free Culture is an excellent tome on the subject), American copyright is about progress, not leaving money to your kids.

    A patent only lasts for twenty years. Imagine how far back technological progress would be stifled with a century-long monopoly on the technology. That's how the Bono act is stifling artistic creativity.

    The first US copyright was fourteen years. The current copyright is a constitutional crime.

    --
    A man legally forbidden from possessing a firearm is in charge of America's nuclear arsenal. Have a nice day.
    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Saturday January 11, @07:29PM

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Saturday January 11, @07:29PM (#1388425)

      >The current copyright is a constitutional crime.

      Agreed. What is remarkable to me is how easily it was extended in clear violation of the language and clear intent of the Constitution, and how hard it seems to be to put it right again.

      --
      🌻🌻 [google.com]