SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Ars Technica reports:
For decades after Linux's early '90s debut, even the hardest of hardcore boosters for the open source operating system had to admit that it couldn't really compete in one important area of software: gaming.
Now, more than a year into the SteamOS era (measuring from that beta launch), the nascent Linux gaming community is cautiously optimistic about the promise of a viable PC gaming market that doesn't rely on a Microsoft OS. Despite technical and business problems that continue to get in the way, Valve has already transformed gaming on Linux from "practically nothing" to "definitely something" and could be on the verge of making it much more than that.
For those already running Linux on their main machines, though, finally having significant gaming options on their platform of choice will continue to be a happy side effect of Valve's still-developing push into this new market. "I do know that in the absolute worst case, the chicken-and-egg problem is solved," Gordon said. "You get people to a platform with games, but games won't come until people are on a platform. Valve being there has clearly given developers the faith to stick their toes in the water right away."
Linux gaming has come a long way. I have a couple hundred games on Steam than run under Linux. (Well, most of them ;) Here's to the next era being freedom oriented from it's foundations. Oculus selling out to FB was a blow, but I think Steam will do it right if only because they have thrown their hat into SteamOS.
"Steam is bringing the best games and user-generated content to exciting new destinations. At GDC 2015, we’ll be giving demos of the refined Steam Controller, new living room devices, and a previously-unannounced SteamVR hardware system."
http://store.steampowered.com/universe/
http://steamcommunity.com/app/250820
http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2015/02/23/steamvr-announced/
And because it's related, interesting and open source.
http://osvr.com/
(Score: 4, Interesting) by SlimmPickens on Sunday March 01 2015, @02:16AM
Why?
- Trust Debian and their keys more than MS. Security first!
- I don't game much, it's more for other software that I don't necessarily want to reboot for.
- I like the idea of having the choice of moving a running VM between machines, or accessing it remotely.
- VMs for different tasks are easier to isolate in VLANs etc.
- There is effectively no processing overhead nowadays with the hardware extensions and SSD's.
- Virtual storage servers would allow me to dynamically choose what is stored locally or on the server (I don't need a 50GB synth installed on every SSD I own for example)
- Because VM's and SDN are the future and I'd like to know more about them.
- Because it's fun.
* Much of this is not implemented yet...one thing at a time. My network is not hobby #1, just something I chip away at, and getting all that stuff working takes a lot of reading.
PS, Hairyfeet, you'll be pleased to know I bought my first AMD system since that old K8 a few days ago (because my K-series doesn't support VT-d).