SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Color scientists already have a word for it: Dressgate. Now the Washington Post reports that a puzzling thing happened on Thursday night consuming millions — perhaps tens of millions — across the planet and trending on Twitter ahead of even Jihadi John’s identification. The problem was this: Roughly three-fourths of people swore that this dress was white and gold, according to BuzzFeed polling but everyone else said it's dress was blue. Others said the dress could actually change colors. So what's going on? According to the NYT our eyes are able to assign fixed colors to objects under widely different lighting conditions. This ability is called color constancy. But the photograph doesn’t give many clues about the ambient light in the room. Is the background bright and the dress in shadow? Or is the whole room bright and all the colors are washed out? If you think the dress is in shadow, your brain may remove the blue cast and perceive the dress as being white and gold. If you think the dress is being washed out by bright light, your brain may perceive the dress as a darker blue and black.
According to Beau Lotto, the brain is doing something remarkable and that's why people are so fascinated by this dress. “It’s entertaining two realities that are mutually exclusive. It’s seeing one reality, but knowing there’s another reality. So you’re becoming an observer of yourself. You’re having tremendous insight into what it is to be human. And that’s the basis of imagination.” As usual xkcd has the final word.
(Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday February 28 2015, @11:34PM
You could open both images in two browser windows side by side..... on the same physical screen.
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/61lcZeEZEPL._UL1500_.jpg [images-amazon.com]
http://img.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2015/02/tumblr_nkcjuq8Tdr1tnacy1o1_500.jpg [washingtonpost.com]
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 2) by wantkitteh on Sunday March 01 2015, @12:00AM
lolwut? I'm theorising that differences in colour representations between displays might have a significant effect on colour perception in edge cases like this. I have no idea what you're thinking.
(Score: 2) by Whoever on Sunday March 01 2015, @12:49AM
I tried playing with the color and other settings for my monitor and could not get it to appear anything other than light blue and dirty brown. No white and gold for me.
(Score: 1) by t-3 on Sunday March 01 2015, @03:58AM
Amazon is definitely black and blue. The other pic looks gold/brown and white to me, but my mom and dad both said they saw black and blue. Is this some kind of benign mass color-blindness?
(Score: 2) by frojack on Sunday March 01 2015, @05:32AM
Were they standing there looking over your shoulder at your computer?
Because I've realized that its impossible to but those two pictures side by side on the SAME MONITOR had have people see different things without some biological thing going on.
There is no way you can put a swatch of BLACK next to GOLD and not have it be apparent to the most casual observer.
http://s22.postimg.org/w621krqdd/You_are_blind.png [postimg.org]
This isn't a discussion about over or under exposure. Its two images side by side taken as given.
Its not about lighting conditions, viewing it side-on or at an angle. Just look at the above image.
Print it off.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 1) by t-3 on Sunday March 01 2015, @08:24PM
Yes, they were looking at the same screen at the same time. http://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/white-gold-blue-black-internet-sees-dress-colors/story?id=29261175 [go.com] Here I see, 1-3 all white and gold. My mom saw 1 (counting from the left) as white and gold, the others as blue and black. I have no problem seeing the blue and black in the amazon pic.