Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Thursday March 13 2014, @12:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the better-living-through-solopsism dept.

Papas Fritas writes:

Michael Schulson writes that if you want to write about spiritually-motivated pseudoscience in America, you can drive hundreds of miles to the Creation Museum in Kentucky but that America's greatest shrine to pseudoscience, the Whole Foods Market, is only a 15-minute trip away from most American urbanites. For example the homeopathy section at Whole Foods has plenty of Latin words and mathematical terms, but many of its remedies are so diluted that, statistically speaking, they may not contain a single molecule of the substance they purport to deliver.

"You can buy chocolate with "a meld of rich goji berries and ashwagandha root to strengthen your immune system," and bottles of ChlorOxygen chlorophyll concentrate, which "builds better blood." There's cereal with the kind of ingredients that are "made in a kitchen-not in a lab," and tea designed to heal the human heart," writes Schulson. "Nearby are eight full shelves of probiotics-live bacteria intended to improve general health. I invited a biologist friend who studies human gut bacteria to come take a look with me. She read the healing claims printed on a handful of bottles and frowned. "This is bullshit," she said, and went off to buy some vegetables."

According to Schulson the total lack of outrage over Whole Foods' existence, and by the total saturation of outrage over the Creation Museum, makes it clear that strict scientific accuracy in the public sphere isn't quite as important to many of us as we might believe. "The moral is not that we should all boycott Whole Foods. It's that whenever we talk about science and society, it helps to keep two rather humbling premises in mind: very few of us are anywhere near rational. And pretty much all of us are hypocrites."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by c0lo on Thursday March 13 2014, @03:03AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Thursday March 13 2014, @03:03AM (#15660) Journal

    very few of us are anywhere near rational. And pretty much all of us are hypocrites.

    Of us? Us being who, exactly? Some weird nations that went beyond the need of immediate survival, safety and stopped between the love/belonging and esteem levels [wikipedia.org] instead of ascending to self-actuation?

    Ask 80% of world population living for less than $10-adjusted/day [globalissues.org] ... would they bother whether or not goji-berry is present in their diet?

    If speaking about hypocrisy and ignorance... I have a hunch that:

    1. pretending we are representative for this world and
    2. choosing not to look around

    denotes more hypocrisy and willful ignorance than the "Whole food market" and Creation museum...

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=3, Interesting=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by sibiday fabis on Thursday March 13 2014, @05:55AM

    by sibiday fabis (2160) on Thursday March 13 2014, @05:55AM (#15723)

    Parent and grandparent not only applies to the "third world" but much of the "first world" as well. Goji? Sure. Overpriced Vitamin C and bioflavinoids available at much less with some diligence. Why would we essentially triple our food budget to obtain the basic nutrients (RDA + peer reviewed supplements that so far appear to have an actual benefit for certain conditions). Nit picking on goji, per se, but rather the overprices "super-nutrient" du jour.

    You can spend a shi*t-ton on unproven "cures/supplements" for no discernible benefit. There's a fair amount of honest (use your own values for "honest") research that seems to show benefits from certain supplements, ranging from full-spectrum light to fish oil to glucosamine/chondriotin. Read, check your sources, look for verification compare prices and sourcing - and try it yourself for a while. If it works for you, great. Weigh the actual benefit to your health vs. the cost. Try a similar but less expensive supplement for comparison. Decide which is the best choice.

    This does not include homeopathy, crystal therapy, channeling and the like. Caveat Emptor. And other Latin/nonLatin warnings.

    • (Score: 2) by bucc5062 on Thursday March 13 2014, @02:26PM

      by bucc5062 (699) on Thursday March 13 2014, @02:26PM (#15879)

      First, before commenting on your specific point, why is this troll article? Every article in one way or another is a troll article because it invites comments; it "trolls" for a response. Bad, ugly, stupid comments may deserve the moniker of troll, but let us not just label an article a Troll just because we may not like the topic. As it is, I think this one could have generated some good discussion on the topic of modern drugs to homeopathic drugs. To that point....

      Your wording seems to indicate you feel homeopathy or homeopathic therapy is quack medicine ('let the buyer beware'). In doing some quick loooking around I found that WebMD [webmd.com] had a well measured statement:

      What is homeopathy used for?

      Historically, people have used homeopathy to maintain health and treat a wide range of long-term illnesses, such as allergies, atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, and irritable bowel syndrome. They have also used it to treat minor injuries, such as cuts and scrapes and muscle strains or sprains. Homeopathic treatment is not considered appropriate for illnesses, such as cancer, heart disease, major infections, or emergencies.

      Homeopathy has been widely used in India, England, and other European countries.

      Is homeopathy safe?

      Homeopathic remedies have been regulated in the United States since 1938 and are considered to be safe.

      Every year we hear about drug companies that put out medicines that have horrible side-effects, can kill, and when under regulated, do little to help yet we continue to bow at the great Drug Gods for healing. Certainly there are charlatans in homeopathic manufacturing, but that should not dismiss the practice out right. Before Pfizer came out with its magic pill I'll bet there was some natural element that made the foundation of the drug.

      Only extremists would think that homeopathy is a complete cure all. Most see it for what it is, a more natural way to help deal with the general issues that afflict us in our daily lives. You have a typical western view of medicine which closes you off to so many other possibilities in health.

      --
      The more things change, the more they look the same
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 13 2014, @03:20PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 13 2014, @03:20PM (#15908)
        And you are helping to prove the point of the article. Anti-science is anti-science, no matter which side of the so-called political spectrum one falls on.
        • (Score: 2) by bucc5062 on Thursday March 13 2014, @03:43PM

          by bucc5062 (699) on Thursday March 13 2014, @03:43PM (#15920)

          Man, I deserve this...sigh...Okay, I had a mis-understanding about homeopathy. I confused the use of natural elements (something which I do believe in and has been scientifically proven in studies) with the practice of homeopathic medicine. After reading upon it (which is why I love SN, Google, and curiosity) I learned more and found that i also have doubts about its specific practice.

          So there is my mae culpa. I am a man of science, but I also believe that there is more we don't know then we do and we should not discount, out of hand, those things which are not developments from "modern science". Because I believe in Science and the scientific method, any claims of "magic" should be held to critical thought, examination, and review. This goes beyond just medicine to energy, engineering, and other areas of the human experience.

          I got egg on my face, but with some natural herbs and spices, it not only tastes good, it is good for me. /grin

          --
          The more things change, the more they look the same
          • (Score: 2) by JeanCroix on Thursday March 13 2014, @05:50PM

            by JeanCroix (573) on Thursday March 13 2014, @05:50PM (#16006)
            Kudos to you, sir. An actual mea culpa? We sure aren't on slashdot anymore...