Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Thursday March 13 2014, @12:53AM   Printer-friendly
from the better-living-through-solopsism dept.

Papas Fritas writes:

Michael Schulson writes that if you want to write about spiritually-motivated pseudoscience in America, you can drive hundreds of miles to the Creation Museum in Kentucky but that America's greatest shrine to pseudoscience, the Whole Foods Market, is only a 15-minute trip away from most American urbanites. For example the homeopathy section at Whole Foods has plenty of Latin words and mathematical terms, but many of its remedies are so diluted that, statistically speaking, they may not contain a single molecule of the substance they purport to deliver.

"You can buy chocolate with "a meld of rich goji berries and ashwagandha root to strengthen your immune system," and bottles of ChlorOxygen chlorophyll concentrate, which "builds better blood." There's cereal with the kind of ingredients that are "made in a kitchen-not in a lab," and tea designed to heal the human heart," writes Schulson. "Nearby are eight full shelves of probiotics-live bacteria intended to improve general health. I invited a biologist friend who studies human gut bacteria to come take a look with me. She read the healing claims printed on a handful of bottles and frowned. "This is bullshit," she said, and went off to buy some vegetables."

According to Schulson the total lack of outrage over Whole Foods' existence, and by the total saturation of outrage over the Creation Museum, makes it clear that strict scientific accuracy in the public sphere isn't quite as important to many of us as we might believe. "The moral is not that we should all boycott Whole Foods. It's that whenever we talk about science and society, it helps to keep two rather humbling premises in mind: very few of us are anywhere near rational. And pretty much all of us are hypocrites."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by monster on Thursday March 13 2014, @02:03PM

    by monster (1260) on Thursday March 13 2014, @02:03PM (#15865) Journal

    Well, that is the nature of the control group: Even if they don't receive the drug/active agent, they must still think that they do, otherwise differences in Placebo effect kick in. You must not be told that you are not eating GMOs, even if that is the case.

    About TFA, there is a newspaper page today about transgenics in an spanish newspaper [eldiario.es] (spanish language) with a quite balanced point of view and a lot of links to actual studies about the aspects of GMOs. I encourage people interested in information about it (and not just bias reinforcement) to follow and read them, they are quite interesting.