Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 12 submissions in the queue.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 04, @02:24AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 04, @02:24AM (#1395153)

    Also, any M --> M, F --> M or F --> F sexual harassment will be investigated carefully before any assumptions are made. Any claim of M --> F sexual harassment is automatically assumed to be true - guilty until proven innocent.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Flamebait=1, Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 04, @08:45AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 04, @08:45AM (#1395180)

    The problem is with M --> F sexual harassment historically is that it was not taken seriously. It was often just dismissed or brushed under the carpet. Things changed from essentially victim blaming or accusing the female of hysteria to believing the victim. In many cases this is a useful way of approaching the situation. The problem is that there are people who will make malicious and vexatious claims of harassment against others. Mounting a robust legal defence is expensive and beyond the means of many people.