SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The Dawn space probe will enter orbit of the dwarf planet Ceres this Friday. Once in orbit it will be at a separation distance of 40,000km. Years ago, Hubble photos revealed a curious bright patch on Ceres. The Dawn probe has been capturing increasingly clearer images as it approaches Ceres and the spots remain mysterious. Rather than a large lighter patch, the resulting photos reveal multiple spots, smaller and brighter than expected.
From a recent BBC article:
"These spots were extremely surprising and they have been puzzling to everyone who has seen them," the Nasa Jet Propulsion Laboratory researcher told reporters.
"They show up in a 92km-wide crater that's about 19 degrees North latitude. The spot in the centre is about twice as bright as the spot on the side of the crater, and as yet it has not been resolved, meaning it is smaller than the 4km pixel size [of the images].
By December it will have reached a final orbit of just 380km, from that distance the images it captures will resolve much finer detail, and hopefully will reveal more about these odd reflective areas.
According to a Scientific American article, "No one knows what the bright spots are but guesses abound: Perhaps they are scars from recent impacts or minerals deposited by active geysers or water ice erupted by “cryovolcanoes”—or something even wilder."
(Score: 3, Interesting) by frojack on Tuesday March 03 2015, @06:12PM
I suspect they could just be frozen water or other hydrocarbons heated and precipitated from impact events.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by dx3bydt3 on Tuesday March 03 2015, @06:32PM
It probably is ice, but the photos so far show something very bright considering that explanation.
The reflectivity of Ceres is even less than that of our moon, one figure I saw was roughly 9%. If the bright patches are ice whether it be from impacts exposing interior ice, or from cryovolcanoes, the reflectivity of those areas would be perhaps 90%. Assuming that the ice and the rest of the surface are diffusely reflecting, then the ratio of brightness should only be ~10:1 The brightness differences shown in the recent photos suggest a greater discrepancy, given that they have yet to resolve to the scale of the bright patches. They can't be much smaller than the ~4km scale that the current photos resolve. If they're smaller, they would have to be brighter, and to be much brighter relative to the rest of the surface there would have to be a specular reflection like a sun glint, the fact the bright spots have shown up in numerous images with different angles of illumination make that unlikely though, so I'm guessing that it's areas of exposed ice at least 4km across.
(Score: 2) by frojack on Tuesday March 03 2015, @06:51PM
TFS also mentions geysers.
Isn't Ceres just too small (590 miles) to generate enough internal pressure and heat to maintain any kind of geysers?
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by c0lo on Tuesday March 03 2015, @08:27PM
Keep into account that the Ceres' surface gravity is 0.029g: you won't need much of a pressure to create geysers.
https://www.youtube.com/@ProfSteveKeen https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 1) by takyon on Tuesday March 03 2015, @10:03PM
Just frozen water? Sounds good to me!
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2) by Adamsjas on Tuesday March 03 2015, @10:51PM
Maybe we should land it on mars somehow?
(Score: 3, Interesting) by takyon on Tuesday March 03 2015, @11:14PM
The great "crash Ceres into Mars" plan. Increase Mars's gravity, increase surface water, induce magnetic field, all in one big bang.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
(Score: 2, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 03 2015, @06:40PM
But, you know, aliens.
(Score: 2) by Nobuddy on Tuesday March 03 2015, @07:47PM
It would be quite a boost to the NASA budget if it was some sort of alien artifact. Satellite, relay dish, or what have you. I bet the US would start really pouring money in to a mission to investigate and bring it back before anyone else could. most likely a manned mission.
(Score: 3, Funny) by bucc5062 on Tuesday March 03 2015, @08:40PM
See, I'm going with this explanation. All of these other hypotheses are too complicated. Geysers? Need heat/water and where did it all come from and why only at that one spot. Impact material? Only in that spot and remaining visible for years and is there enough ice around to create the effect?
It's an alien artifact. The pisser is that the moment NASA gets clear enough resolution they will start to deny it is artificial, they will doctor photos to "prove" it is just a natural formation and secretly ensure no more probes can study the mini planet. Manned mission, bah! The last thing they want
/wink
The more things change, the more they look the same
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 03 2015, @09:10PM
For the doubters. [xkcd.com]
-- gewg_
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 04 2015, @02:43AM
It's huge diamonds that are remnants from the core of the planet that blew up creating the asteroid belt.
(Score: 2) by Covalent on Tuesday March 03 2015, @07:47PM
From the article:
“Bright” is a relative term—all the bright spots are actually quite dark but still far brighter than the rest of Ceres, which is blacker than coal.
I wish they had indicated exactly how much brighter "far brighter" is, but they are not particularly clear. At one point the article mentions that the bright spot is "4 times brighter" than the spot on side of the crater, but that doesn't really say much in terms of absolute brightness.
That said, my guess is that it's just ejecta from an impact. The surface of 67P is also exceptionally dark, as are most asteroids. So perhaps large bodies like Ceres get formed from rock and ice and the like, then get covered with dust from comets and asteroids. The original body is slightly lighter than the dust covering, so when the body gets hit, the impact looks lighter. Old impacts get covered with a fresh layer of dust, so they look dark again.
The interesting thing to me is that there are a few of these bright spots. If they are caused by impacts, then perhaps impacts on Ceres are reasonably common?
You can't rationally argue somebody out of a position they didn't rationally get into.
(Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday March 03 2015, @11:19PM
Well you can already see the cratered surface of Ceres, and it is in an asteroid belt.
[SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]