SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:
A group of technology companies and lobbyists want the European Commission (EC) to take action to reduce the region's reliance on foreign-owned digital services and infrastructure.
In an open letter to EC President Ursula von der Leyen and Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty Henna Virkkunen, the group of nearly 100 organizations proposed the creation of a sovereign infrastructure fund to invest in key technology and lessen dependence on US corporations.
The letter points to recent events, including the farcical Munich Security Conference, as a sign of "the stark geopolitical reality Europe is now facing," and says that building strategic autonomy in key sectors is now an urgent imperative for European countries.
Signatories include aerospace giant Airbus, France's Dassault Systèmes, European cloud operator OVHcloud, chip designer SiPearl, open source biz Nextcloud, and a host of others including organizations such as the European Startup Network.
OVHcloud said the group was calling "for a collective industrial policy strategy to strengthen Europe's competitiveness and strategic autonomy. We are convinced this is the premise of what we hope will be a larger movement of the entire ecosystem."
Proposals include the sovereign infrastructure fund, which would be able to support public investment, especially in capital-intensive sectors like semiconductors, with "significant additional commitment of funds allocated and/or underwritten" by the European Investment Bank (EIB) and national public funding bodies.
It also suggests there should be a formal requirement for the public sector to "buy European" and source their IT requirements from European-led and assembled solutions, while recognizing that these may involve complex supply chains with foreign components.
[...] This isn't the first time that concerns about US hegemony in technology have been raised. Recently, the DARE project launched to develop hardware and software based on the open RISC-V architecture, backed by EuroHPC JU funding, while fears have been aired about the dominance of American-owned cloud companies in the European market.
Such concerns have been heightened by recent actions, such as the suggestion that the US might cut off access to Starlink internet services in Ukraine as a political bargaining strategy. Starlink owner Elon Musk later denied that this would ever happen.
The letter notes that these issues have already been set out by the EuroStack initiative, made up of many of the companies that signed the letter to EC President von der Leyen. The Register asked the European Commission to comment.
On the other side of the pond, the Computer and Communications Industry Association (CCIA) recently published a report claiming that US companies face "substantial financial burdens" due to the European Union's digital regulations.
It says that US tech companies are losing "billions" through having to comply with regulations such as the Digital Markets Act (DMA), and having to obtain user consent for their data to be used for advertising purposes.
(Score: 5, Touché) by Gaaark on Saturday March 22 2025, @04:30PM (4 children)
If you are in 'military support', maybe you remember a little war started over "Dey gots WMD!"
https://english.news.cn/20220902/735703a45cfd458791179d4c0a80e727/c.html [english.news.cn]
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. I have always been here. ---Gaaark 2.0 --
(Score: 2) by number11 on Saturday March 22 2025, @04:57PM (3 children)
That's a bit of an exaggeration (from a PRC source). But it may well be true that (since WW2) there has been no military attack upon US territory by any other country. US attacks on other parties have been for other reasons, usually economic or political. If we're keeping count, the US would almost certainly be the world's biggest perpetrator, though part of that is that the US has also been the world's most powerful country, and one of the largest.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by Gaaark on Saturday March 22 2025, @05:28PM (2 children)
Can you refute it?
Also at:
https://www.investmentwatchblog.com/america-has-started-81-of-the-wars-since-wwii/ [investmentwatchblog.com]
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. I have always been here. ---Gaaark 2.0 --
(Score: 2) by number11 on Saturday March 22 2025, @07:02PM
Refute it? I'm not sure what it even means.
First, I'd guess that there have been far more than 248 armed conflicts since WW2. Only 47 cases not started by the US seems like a pretty low number, and 201 seems very high. They only describe half a dozen, though there are certainly more, China alone has engaged in half a dozen that didn't involve the US. Does "153 regions of the world" comprise the whole world, or exclude some regions? They don't show their list to us, or tell precisely what "initiated" means, so we have no way of knowing, It's a propaganda piece (which does not mean it's not true, just that the authors have an ax to grind).
The investmentwatchblog piece seems to be a rewrite of that same Chinese story. I don't know who they are, but their homepage stories seem to mostly be rightwing/MAGA/goldbug content.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Sunday March 23 2025, @02:00AM
Indeed. For a glaring example, the Korean War is cited as being started by the US. It was instead started by North Korea. When they get their first example so brazenly wrong with obvious bad faith, it's not worth the effort to go through the rest. Note the weaselly language:
In other words, they acknowledge that the war started before the US was involved and still blamed the US for starting the war! The above quote does have value as a historic relic, this is probably the first time in decades that such North Korean propaganda has been used outside of North Korea!