Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday March 04 2015, @07:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the over-to-you dept.

What free software is there in the way of organizing lots of documents?

To be more precise, the ones I *need* to organize are the files on hard drives, though if I could include documents I have elsewhere (bookshelves and photocopy files) I wouldn't mind. They are text documents in a variety of file formats and languages, source code for current and obsolete systems, jpeg images, film clips, drawings, SVG files, files, object code, shared libraries, fragments of drafts of books, ragged software documentation, works in progress ...

Of course the files are already semi-organized in directories, but I haven't yet managed to find a suitable collection of directory names. Hierarchical classification isn't ideal -- there are files that fit in several categories, and there are a lot files that have to be in a particular location because of the way they are used (executables in a bin directory, for example) or the way they are updated or maintained. Taxonomists would advise setting up a controlled vocabulary of tags and attaching tags to the various files. I'd end up with a triples store or some other database describing files.

More down the page...

But how to identify the files being tagged? A file-system pathname isn't enough. Files get moved, and sometimes entire directory trees full of files get moved from one place to another for various pragmatic reasons. And a hashcode isn't enough. Files get edited, upgraded, recompiled, reformatted, converted from JIS code to UTF-8, and so forth. Images get cropped and colour-corrected. And under these changes they should keep their assigned classification tags.

Now a number of file formats can accommodate metadata. And some software that manipulates files can preserve metadata and even allow user editing of the metadata. But more doesn't.

Much of it could perhaps be done by automatic content analysis. Other material may require labour-intensive manual classification. Now I don't expect to see any off-the-shelf solution for all of this, but does anyone have ideas as to how to accomplish even some of this? Even poorly? Does anyone know of relevant practical tools? Or have ideas towards tools that *should* exist but currently don't? I'm ready to experiment.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Wednesday March 04 2015, @08:57PM

    by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 04 2015, @08:57PM (#153237) Homepage Journal

    Looks interesting, but seems to require manual tagging. It's open-source. It puts the tags into the filenames. This isn't likely to work well in the names of, say C include files. And it won't work for pieces of information smaller than a file. I wonder whether it uses a controlled vocabulary for the tags.

    I'll have to look at this further, as a source of ideas, and maybe as a directly usable system for part of the file base.
     

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 04 2015, @09:23PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 04 2015, @09:23PM (#153249)

    Yeah. For documents it would be great. For the output of scripts, or for source files, not so sure.
    smaller than a file?

    • (Score: 2) by hendrikboom on Wednesday March 04 2015, @10:58PM

      by hendrikboom (1125) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday March 04 2015, @10:58PM (#153276) Homepage Journal

      Smaller than a file? Like an email with six attachments. Like a file of miscellaneous plot ideas for writing novels. like compiled functions in a library.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 05 2015, @01:05AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday March 05 2015, @01:05AM (#153326)

        ah content indexing, I get it.