Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday March 06 2015, @12:02PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-just-business dept.

A consortium of environmental scientists has expressed strong concern about the impact of a controversial Central American canal across Nicaragua.

The path of the Nicaragua Interoceanic Grand Canal to connect the Atlantic and Pacific oceans will cut through Lake Cocibolca (aka Lake Nicaragua), Central America's main freshwater reservoir and the largest tropical freshwater lake of the Americas; this plan will force the relocation of indigenous populations and impact a fragile ecosystem, including species at risk of extinction, according to Rice University environmental engineer Pedro Alvarez and other members of the consortium.

Alvarez is co-corresponding author of an article that includes 21 co-authors from 18 institutions in the United States and Central and South America who gathered at a multidisciplinary international workshop in Managua, Nicaragua, last November to discuss the project. The paper, titled "Scientists Raise Alarms About Fast Tracking of Transoceanic Canal Through Nicaragua," was published this week by the American Chemical Society journal Environmental Science and Technology.

http://phys.org/news/2015-03-scientists-nicaragua-canal.html
[Abstract]: http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/acs.est.5b00215
[Source]: http://news.rice.edu/2015/03/04/scientists-question-rush-to-build-canal-2/

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Hairyfeet on Friday March 06 2015, @07:10PM

    by Hairyfeet (75) <{bassbeast1968} {at} {gmail.com}> on Friday March 06 2015, @07:10PM (#153900) Journal

    Operation Plowshares, which was an attempt by the US military (along with their defense contractor pals) to find a non war use for nukes as it had recently been disclosed that pretty much every scenario they come up with had nukes being a worthless weapon thanks to MAD. Its been awhile since I read up on Plowshares but IIRC they also looked into using a bomb in the KT range to put out coal seam fires along with using KT bombs to drill out tunnels for railroad and car usage. This was also around the time they started talking about Project Orion, building a spacecraft powered by nuclear bombs. At the end of the day the flaws with these ideas were pretty damned obvious, anything you built using nukes would be hot as hell and unlike regular explosives its pretty damned hard to create a nuclear shape charge. But I was always fascinated by how batshit things were then, look up the nuclear mortar they built sometime, right up there with an atomic hand grenade on dumb fucking ideas.

    As for TFA? We can bitch and moan but ultimately its up to the people of Nicaragua whether it gets built or not. these arguments kinda remind me of how we bitch about how much pollution India and China create as they become modernized while ignoring we too used a shitload of pollution to get where we are. If we are gonna try to tell Nicaragua what they can and can't build we should be offering some financial incentive to make this idea less attractive, just saying "you can't do that, its bad for the environment" just strikes me as being a bunch of hypocrites.

    --
    ACs are never seen so don't bother. Always ready to show SJWs for the racists they are.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1) by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 06 2015, @10:45PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday March 06 2015, @10:45PM (#153989)

    AC here. I bothered.
    Deal with it.