Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Sunday March 08 2015, @12:41AM   Printer-friendly
from the "those-were-the-days-my-friend" dept.

Ingrid Burrington writes in The Atlantic about a little-remembered incident that occurred in 1992 when activists Keith Kjoller and Peter Lumsdaine snuck into a Rockwell International facility in Seal Beach, California and in what they called an "act of conscience" used wood-splitting axes to break into two clean rooms containing nine satellites being built for the US government. Lumsdaine took his axe to one of the satellites, hitting it over 60 times. The Brigade's target was the Navigation Satellite Timing And Ranging (NAVSTAR) Program and the Global Positioning System (GPS). Both men belonged to the Lockheed Action Collective, a protest group that staged demonstrations and blockaded the entrance at the Lockheed Missiles & Space Co. test base in Santa Cruz in 1990. They said they intentionally took axes to the $50-million Navstar Global Position System satellite to bring the public's attention to what they termed the government's attempt to control the world through modern technology. "I had to slow the deployment of this system (which) makes conventional warfare much more lethal and nuclear war winnable in the eyes of some," an emotional Kjoller told the judge before receiving an 18-month sentence. "It's something that I couldn't let go by. I tried to do what was right rather than what was convenient."

Burrington recently contacted Lumsdaine to learn more about the Brigade and Lumsdaine expresses no regrets for his actions. Even if the technology has more and more civilian uses, Lumsdaine says, GPS remains “military in its origins, military in its goals, military in its development and [is still] controlled by the military.” Today, Lumsdaine views the thread connecting GPS and drones as part of a longer-term movement by military powers toward automated systems and compared today’s conditions to the opening sequence of Terminator 2, where Sarah Connor laments that the survivors of Skynet’s nuclear apocalypse “lived only to face a new nightmare: the war against the machines.” "I think in a general way people need to look for those psychological, spiritual, cultural, logistical, technological weak points and leverage points and push hard there," says Lumsdaine. "It is so easy for all of us as human beings to take a deep breath and step aside and not face how very serious the situation is, because it's very unpleasant to look at the effort and potential consequences of challenging the powers that be. But the only thing higher than the cost of resistance is the cost of not resisting."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by wantkitteh on Sunday March 08 2015, @01:52PM

    by wantkitteh (3362) on Sunday March 08 2015, @01:52PM (#154437) Homepage Journal

    You make it sound like GPS-enabled munitions are some sort of uncontrolled, compulsive addiction. They're not.

    I would argue they are. Given the ways drones are currently deployed and used, they are a Commander-in-Chief's wet dream due to the lack of domestic political fallout.

    Given the current deployments in Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia are "covert" (like there's anything covert about Hellfire missiles raining down from planes) there are no boots on the ground in those theatres. That means no going to Congress/Senate/whoever to get the bill authorised, the CIA's practically unlimited black budget swallows it all up nice and quietly. That means no US military casualties for the TV to show academy graduation photos of, no friendly fire incidents for high-ranking officers to read prepared statements about at live press conferences.

    That means all targets can be prosecuted, no matter how poorly indentified [rt.com] that target is or how many civilian deaths [pitchinteractive.com] will be caused. When the rules of who you can launch an airstrike on are slow loose, is it any wonder that the frequency of drone strikes has vastly increased since mid-2008? The technology itself isn't the addictive part - it's the way you can use them that's got the CIA completely hooked.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3