SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the founding-fathers-didn't-have-tazers dept.
Massachusetts' ban on the private possession of stun guns—an "electrical weapon" under the statute—does not violate the Second Amendment right to bear arms, the state's top court has ruled.
The decision says ( http://cdn.arstechnica.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/stungunMA-ruling.pdf ) (PDF) that the US Constitution's framers never envisioned the modern stun-gun device, first patented in 1972. The top court said stun guns are not suitable for military use, and that it did not matter whether state lawmakers have approved the possession of handguns outside the home.The court, ruling in the case of a Massachusetts woman caught with stun gun, said the stun gun is a "thoroughly modern invention" not protected by the Second Amendment, although handguns are protected.
(Score: 1) by tftp on Tuesday March 10 2015, @07:28PM
Not sure why people want to do this unless muggers in the US are very polite and wait patiently for you to get out your gun and remove the safety, and then let you step back out of their reach so you can safely raise it.
There are many confrontations that occur at a reasonable distance, or give you a reasonable time to prepare. You lose in other situations, no matter how well you might be armed and trained.