Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by jelizondo on Tuesday July 29 2025, @09:44PM   Printer-friendly

Arthur T Knackerbracket has processed the following story:

US Senator Maria Cantwell (D-WA) has demanded that Google-owned incident response firm Mandiant hand over the Salt Typhoon-related security assessments of AT&T and Verizon that, according to the lawmaker, both operators have thus far refused to give Congress.

AT&T and Verizon's networks were among those breached by China's Salt Typhoon, potentially giving Beijing long-term, persistent access to critical US networks.

"In December 2024, AT&T and Verizon both claimed that their networks were secure, but only weeks before the companies made those announcements, the U.S. government warned the breach was so significant it made it 'impossible' for agencies 'to predict a time frame on when we'll have a full eviction,'" the Democratic senator from Washington state wrote in a July 23 letter [PDF] to Mandiant Executive VP Sandra Joyce.

To get a better idea of whether the telecoms firms' claims are true, Cantwell last month sent a letter to both AT&T and Verizon requesting information about steps they took to secure their networks. Both companies told her that Mandiant had conducted security assessments following the Salt Typhoon intrusions, but the telcos refused to hand them over, according to the senator. 

"This response only heightens my concerns about AT&T's and Verizon's current security posture, as they are either unwilling or unable to provide specific documentation that would corroborate their claims that their networks are secure," Cantwell wrote. 

So instead, Cantwell has asked Mandiant to provide these documents by August 6. Specifically, the senator wants the incident response firm to share with Congress:

  • A copy of all reports, assessments, and analyses Mandiant conducted for AT&T and Verizon, respectively, in response to the Salt Typhoon attacks.
  • A list of any recommendations by Mandiant that have not been fully addressed by AT&T or Verizon in response to the Salt Typhoon attacks.
  • All records related to the costs and expenses of Mandiant's work for AT&T and Verizon, respectively, in response to the Salt Typhoon attacks.

It's highly unlikely, however, that American networks have fully eradicated the Chinese spies and locked all of their backdoors into US-based IT systems.

In February, two months after AT&T and Verizon confirmed that Chinese government-backed snoops accessed portions of their systems earlier in 2024, Recorded Future's Insikt Group documented Salt Typhoon compromises in at least seven devices linked to global telecom providers and other orgs.

Plus, the PRC snoops "possibly targeted" more than a dozen universities, including the University of California, Los Angeles, to access research related to telecommunications, engineering, and technology, according to the infosec shop.

Then, in June, SecurityScorecard's strike threat analysts told The Register that the team uncovered an ongoing campaign, designed to gain long-term access to networks that bears all the markings of one of China's "Typhoon" crews.

The Cyber Safety Review Board (CSRB), under the Department of Homeland Security umbrella, had been investigating Salt Typhoon, and how the Chinese cyber spies penetrated US government and telecommunications networks, prior to the board's dissolution on President Trump's first day in office.

Also last month, a group of Democratic senators urged Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to reestablish the CSRB, in large part so the board could finish its Salt Typhoon probe.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by jelizondo (653) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Gaaark on Wednesday July 30 2025, @12:06AM (4 children)

    by Gaaark (41) on Wednesday July 30 2025, @12:06AM (#1411941) Journal

    So... politicians can DEMAND a corporation(s) do something and be ignored, but DAMN, if you harvest crops for a living, you can be plucked off the street by masked men and deported and THAT'S OKAY!

    Who has the REAL power in the US?
        "Ee'd Plebnista"?...nerp.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. I have always been here. ---Gaaark 2.0 --
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Offtopic=1, Insightful=1, Interesting=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 30 2025, @02:14AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 30 2025, @02:14AM (#1411952)

    Who has the REAL power in the US?

    Yes, the people. They voted for this with eyes wide shut, and are letting it happen, took decades to get where we are, but the path was always clear.

    • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Wednesday July 30 2025, @10:51PM (2 children)

      by Gaaark (41) on Wednesday July 30 2025, @10:51PM (#1412021) Journal

      Unfortunately, with half the Americans being stupid as sticks, the Corporations are STILL the ones with the power.

      --
      --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. I have always been here. ---Gaaark 2.0 --
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 30 2025, @11:36PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday July 30 2025, @11:36PM (#1412025)

        Yes, but the power is given, by the people, not taken. What people won't admit is that we make/let it happen, and nobody is going to stop it but us. There is no alternative

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 02 2025, @02:27AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Saturday August 02 2025, @02:27AM (#1412213)
        It's funny though, tons of US people don't like Big Government, but don't they know there's no right to bear arms in Disneyland and there's no freedom of speech in Apple?

        It ain't the quantity of Government that's the problem it's the quality. And if you have a government that's about as a bad as an average corporation, given that it's the government and not the corps that are restricted by those "Amendments", you might want more areas controlled by the government not less.

        You already have all those people with guns to fight against the government if it's oppressive right? 🤣