SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
SoylentNews
The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Journal by kolie
whats up soylentils. any good meta discussion of soylent we care to have?
-- other than actual doxxing or CSAM etc don't flag posts here thx --
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
There's small choice in rotten apples.
-- William Shakespeare, "The Taming of the Shrew"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 20, @05:25AM (7 children)
More spam mods just reinforces the abuse this site suffers under. Good luck turds.
Sorry Kolie, you bought a turd.
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 20, @06:11AM (4 children)
Complicit? He is providing the servers for janrinok to censor on! Not a good look. What if his legit businesses get wind of what is happening here?
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 20, @06:17AM (1 child)
Oh noes he might get canceled! Better than assaulted by ICE against Constitutional rights.
I still can't wrap my head around "promoting genocide is not illegal but don't dare call them Nazis."
As always the proof is un the pudding. They had a chance here and of course blew it to reinforce their narrative control.
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday October 25, @09:14AM
I can't get my head around this comment being modded SPAM for being from the Bannee who must not be named, when I quite clearly know it is not. False positives, based on content? Censorship.
(Score: 3, Funny) by kolie on Monday October 20, @02:47PM (1 child)
Oh man, what if the company that I own and operate figures out I donate my own companies resources to a non-profit. The horror!
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 20, @08:35PM
Are you a member of a Young Republican chat group, in addition to hosting SN?
(Score: 3, Informative) by janrinok on Monday October 20, @07:03AM (1 child)
This is why you keep receiving Spam moderations.
The last on this list is because you shared an account (against site rules) for the express purpose of targeting those from the right wing who expressed their views. The account had a name that was designed to hide the abuse. You were using the SAME account as another user, whom you claim you cannot identify nor can you prove how you came by the account. You, by coincidence or design, have often used the same IP addresses, and appeared online at the same times as each other. You have targeted the site staff, just as the other user has regularly done. You now wish to claim responsibility for selected comments and moderations made by that account, but not for others which do not show you in a good light. You have admitted this on this site in public. You also claim that you were misidentified while operating that account. You seem to forget that moderations have to be done by a logged-in account - the account name is associated with each moderation. We know when you moderated, who you moderated, how you moderated them and which connection you used to do so. We know when you were online.
There is a price associated with being an AC. If you walk like a duck, and quack like a duck, people will think that you are a duck. Get an account. The 'problem' that you perceive only occurs with a couple of anonymous posts in journals.
You were moderated accordingly and appropriately.
[nostyle RIP 06 May 2025]
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 20, @07:43AM
I share a dozen accounts, janrinok, you stupid git! Half of your regular users are sockpuppets that defy your detection. The rest are state actors, engaged in Information warfare. You are out of your league, over your head, and possibly in danger from three letters agencies.