Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

Journal by kolie

whats up soylentils. any good meta discussion of soylent we care to have?

-- other than actual doxxing or CSAM etc don't flag posts here thx --

Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by janrinok on Monday October 20, @07:03AM (1 child)

    by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 20, @07:03AM (#1421414) Journal

    You are a stupid asshole.

    The double standards, privacy violations, and outright lies from an administrator over the last few years have me pissed off

    You have raised numerous complaints (or more correctly the same complaint numerous times) in lots of different journals.

    sounding like ///a banned user///" which belies "moderating based on content"

    This is why you keep receiving Spam moderations.

    The last on this list is because you shared an account (against site rules) for the express purpose of targeting those from the right wing who expressed their views. The account had a name that was designed to hide the abuse. You were using the SAME account as another user, whom you claim you cannot identify nor can you prove how you came by the account. You, by coincidence or design, have often used the same IP addresses, and appeared online at the same times as each other. You have targeted the site staff, just as the other user has regularly done. You now wish to claim responsibility for selected comments and moderations made by that account, but not for others which do not show you in a good light. You have admitted this on this site in public. You also claim that you were misidentified while operating that account. You seem to forget that moderations have to be done by a logged-in account - the account name is associated with each moderation. We know when you moderated, who you moderated, how you moderated them and which connection you used to do so. We know when you were online.

    false positives are toxic and destroy trust in the system.

    There is a price associated with being an AC. If you walk like a duck, and quack like a duck, people will think that you are a duck. Get an account. The 'problem' that you perceive only occurs with a couple of anonymous posts in journals.

    You were moderated accordingly and appropriately.

    --
    [nostyle RIP 06 May 2025]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 20, @07:43AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 20, @07:43AM (#1421421)

    I share a dozen accounts, janrinok, you stupid git! Half of your regular users are sockpuppets that defy your detection. The rest are state actors, engaged in Information warfare. You are out of your league, over your head, and possibly in danger from three letters agencies.