SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 8 submissions in the queue.
SoylentNews
The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Journal by kolie
whats up soylentils. any good meta discussion of soylent we care to have?
-- other than actual doxxing or CSAM etc don't flag posts here thx --
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Chess tonight.
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Saturday October 25, @12:46AM (19 children)
[nostyle RIP 06 May 2025]
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Saturday October 25, @11:03AM (4 children)
[nostyle RIP 06 May 2025]
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Saturday October 25, @11:09AM (3 children)
You have used this technique several times before. You dox a name in one post, part of the address in another, a State or Country in another etc. Then when all the information has been passed, the final one is often incitement to some form of abuse or threat to the person you are doxxing.
You have passed partial doxxing information 3 times over the last 2 weeks against 2 different community members.
[nostyle RIP 06 May 2025]
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 26, @12:28AM (2 children)
Muskogee, OK.
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 26, @12:32AM (1 child)
Merle
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 26, @12:36AM
Haagard.
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 26, @03:06AM (3 children)
Thrice now janrinok has ignored kolie's request that there be no flagging in this journal. Kind of a Peter, ain't he?
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday October 26, @05:55AM (2 children)
[nostyle RIP 06 May 2025]
(Score: 2) by kolie on Sunday October 26, @04:48PM (1 child)
Yea the comments in question should rightly be flagged here, although they are a bit silly and obviously attempts at doing stupid shit to win stupid prizes....
| 1422103 |
Are you suggesting ####, otherwise known as ####,, actually does live at ####, in ####,? I find no such address on Google maps, and so I cannot deliver any Amazon packages to this address. Try calling him at Jenny's number, 867-5309, you can look up the country code and area code yourself.
|
| 1422117 |
####, lives at One Microsoft Way, Redmond, WA, Not sure what the Zip Code is. Santa is at P.O. Box 1, North Pole, Alaska. Just ask, I can dox some more!
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 26, @09:36AM (1 child)
Wow, Janrinok has lost it! Called out for three times ignoring kolie's request to not flag in his journal, janrinok has flagged that, too! Must be that he thinks any discussion of doxxing is equivalent to doxxing, even though doxing is not illegal in Oregon, or Britanny, for that matter. So, can someone rein in the Mad Editor, and rescind his rude flaggings, so we can continue with a rational discussion of issues with Soylent Phoenix?
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Sunday October 26, @09:56AM
PII is information that enables a person to be identified and is defined in the US as:
[nostyle RIP 06 May 2025]
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 26, @08:24PM (5 children)
Fictional doxxing is just as illegal as the real thing? But it is hard to direct persons or armed authorities to a place that does not exist! Seems jan has joined the Lost Boys, Second star on the rigth, and straight on till morning, right-o! Waiting for the Penny Lane to drop. There is a house, in New Orleans, they call the Rising Sun! 221B Baker Street is the residence of the person you seek! Or try 1150 W Addison St. Chicago, IL 60613, you know who lives there?
(Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday October 26, @10:38PM
Blues Brothers? Wanted fugitives in a dozen states! "She caught the katey, and left me the mule to flag!"
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 27, @06:11PM
Your mom lives there.
(Score: 5, Touché) by kolie on Monday October 27, @06:17PM (1 child)
Your entire argument is a reductio ad absurdum that deliberately conflates an ontological problem (is this real?) with a pragmatic one (how must we act?).
You are placing an impossible epistemic burden on operators, demanding they be omniscient polymaths who can instantly discern veridical data from fictional trivia across all global cultures. Your "well-known" examples are merely artifacts of your own cultural priors.
The only prudent and scalable rule is simple: if a post is prima facie doxxing, it is treated as such. The operator's duty is not to become a scholastic debating the reality of your data, but to act prophylactically-at no detriment to any legitimate discourse. Your post is a disingenuous attempt to rules-lawyer a policy whose intent is perfectly clear.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 30, @11:55PM
Newer systems that rely on "AI" to process tickets may eventually be able to filter out this BS but for now they, and humans, have difficulty telling the difference between a real statement and one of pure fantasy.
Your human brain bolstered by your memories and life experience grant you the ability to tell this is not real. Great. The address given here appears to be real. No, I don't know who lives at 1150 W Addison and a quick internet search offers no answers. If this is a satirical reference then it falls flat.
No, we're not there yet. Really. We're not. The current generation of LLM / AI tech may help but until we can definitively tell fantasy from reality and have a reliable method for problem investigation in real time we are stuck with what we have. Humans. Fallible humans. People capable of taking facts literally and not recognising humor intermeshed with reality. So no, keep it in your pants, don't post stuff that looks real, and be nice.