Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
The Fine print: The following are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

stuff

Journal by kolie

whats up soylentils. any good meta discussion of soylent we care to have?

-- other than actual doxxing or CSAM etc don't flag posts here thx --

stuff | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 200 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Reply to Comment Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 24, @10:35AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 24, @10:35AM (#1422010)

    You know what the problem is, and you know what the solution is, kolie. All that remains is to implement it.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Spam=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Spam' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   -1  

  • (Score: 2) by kolie on Friday October 24, @02:26PM (2 children)

    by kolie (2622) Subscriber Badge on Friday October 24, @02:26PM (#1422022) Journal

    Thx for really clearing that up.

    • (Score: -1, Spam) by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 27, @10:48AM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday October 27, @10:48AM (#1422458)

      You really don't understand, at all, do you, kolie? You keep asking, but not listening. I was hopeful when you showed up as the savior of SoylentNews, but now I am starting to see that nothing will change. Sorry.

      • (Score: 2) by kolie on Monday October 27, @06:09PM

        by kolie (2622) Subscriber Badge on Monday October 27, @06:09PM (#1422493) Journal

        Since you seem intent on arguing purely by ipse dixit, you leave us with no rationale to analyze. You steadfastly refuse to make your esoteric beliefs exoteric for the rest of us. Given this steadfast refusal to provide any logical framework, what is one to conclude, other than that your objective is not consensus, but conflagration?