Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Wednesday October 29, @06:52AM   Printer-friendly
from the paging-Mr-Pot-call-from-Mr-Kettle dept.

The Australian Government wants AI to pay for copyright fees in move that may be more about getting a piece of the billions invested in AI. ARIA chief executive Annabelle Herd of the Copyright and AI Reference Group (CAIRG) has called the recommendation for a text and data mining exception "a radical change" that has been "put forward with very little evidence".

"Artificial Intelligence presents significant opportunities for Australia and our economy, however it's important that Australian creatives benefit from these opportunities too," Attorney-General Michelle Rowland said.

"Australian creatives are not only world class, but they are also the lifeblood of Australian culture, and we must ensure the right legal protections are in place."

[...] It is a difficult space for governments to regulate as they balance embracing the promised economic boons of AI without cumbersome red tape while also pitching guardrails.

In the lead-up to Labor's economic reform roundtable in August, the Productivity Commission urged against heavy-handed regulation of AI, warning it could smother opportunities.

Among its recommendations was a text and data mining exception – a call that sparked furore.

But Ms Rowland vowed the government would not "weaken copyright protections when it comes to AI".

"The tech industry and the creative sector must now come together and find sensible and workable solutions to support innovation while ensuring creators are compensated," she said.

"The government will support these next steps through the renewed focus tasked to the Copyright and AI reference group."


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 29, @12:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday October 29, @12:37PM (#1422692)

    Why should this specific group get a pass? No one else does, except perhaps the copyright police themselves when they feel like it.

    This horse has already bolted. Whinging about locking the barn door is pointless. They have copied everything under the sun and now just want a free range to use it for profit.

    Oh no! People have noticed! We did something bad! Boo hoo! What about our investment? Our investors? We are Too Big To Fail. Humanity depends on us. Workers will not be able to do their jobs without ChatGPT, Copilot, GrokAI, BingleBongleBooAIOfficeHandyHelper5000.1

    I am crying tears of pain for them. Really. I am. Not tears of joy. Never.

    :-: alas I am out of popcorn. brb. keep rolling. >>>

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +3  
       Funny=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3