Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Wednesday March 18 2015, @06:51PM   Printer-friendly
from the data-is-power dept.

Large datasets and predictive analytics software are a fertile field for innovation, but while excellent open source tools like Sci-Py, R, etc are freely available, the datasets are not. A Computerworld article notes that the scarcity of large publicly available data collections has led to a database released for a competition by Netflix half a decade ago now being constantly used in computer science research.

Australia's government does provide an easy way to find, access and reuse some public datasets, but most public and private databases are silo-ed away from experimenters. The Open Data Handbook offers some guidelines for defining openness in data, but offers little in ways to drive organisations to make their datasets available.

So do we need a GPL for data, and if so, what would it look like?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by wantkitteh on Thursday March 19 2015, @02:50PM

    by wantkitteh (3362) on Thursday March 19 2015, @02:50PM (#159970) Homepage Journal

    "...disparate data sources can be combined to reduce anonymity whether they're open or not."

    Okay - put your data where you mouth is - d0x yourself. Release every scrap of data you can about yourself under a creative commons license. It can all be used whether it's open or not, right? It won't make any difference to you if you just make it more convenient for everyone to access, right? Do it or stfufe.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2