Joe Nocera writes in The New York Times that a forthcoming biography “Becoming Steve Jobs,” is leading readers to re-evaluate the “stagnant stereotypes” of Jobs that have only grown stronger after his death. According to the stereotypes, “Steve was a genius with a flair for design,” whose powers of persuasion were such that he could convince people that the sun rose in the west and set in the east. On the other hand, he was also “a pompous jerk,” who humiliated employees and “disregarded everyone else in his single-minded pursuit of perfection.”
It is Schlender’s and Tetzeli’s contention that Jobs was a far more complex and interesting man than the stereotype, and a good part of their book is an attempt to craft a more rounded portrait. According to Nocera the callow, impetuous, arrogant youth who co-founded Apple was very different from the mature and thoughtful man who returned to his struggling creation and turned it into a company that made breathtaking products while becoming the dominant technology company of our time.
How did a young man so reckless and arrogant that he was exiled from the company he founded become the most effective visionary business leader of our time, ultimately transforming the daily life of billions of people? For Schlender and Tetzeli, the crucial period was the most overlooked part of Jobs’s career: The years from 1985 to 1997, when he was in exile from Apple and running NeXT. Equally important, Jobs also owned Pixar, the animation studio he bought from George Lucas. It took years before Pixar came out with its first full-length movie, “Toy Story.” During that time, Jobs saw how Ed Catmull, Pixar’s president, managed the company’s creative talent. Catmull taught Jobs how to manage employees.
"When Jobs returned to Apple, he was more patient — with people and with products. His charisma still drew people to him, but he no longer drove them away with his abrasive behavior and impossible demands. He had also learned that his ideas weren’t always the right ones, and he needed to listen to others." Perhaps the most important example of this was the App Store. Jobs had initially opposed allowing outside developers to build apps for the iPhone, but he did a quick about-face once he realized he was wrong. "Jobs has long been hailed as one of the great creative minds of modern business," concludes Nocera. "He was [also] a great manager. You can’t build a great company if you aren’t one."
(Score: 2, Disagree) by redneckmother on Friday March 20 2015, @02:53AM
I am still struck by Apple's "lock in" and "walled garden" philosophies. Yes, Jobs was very (financially) successful, but methinks he missed out on an opportunity (or three) to change computing and software.
So many opportunities, so many missed steps.
Mas cerveza por favor.
(Score: 2) by Nerdfest on Friday March 20 2015, @03:21AM
I think if a worthy competitor hadn't come along it really *would have* changed software, just not for the better. Even as it is, people are now more open the idea of being told what they are and aren't allowed to install. As I mentioned in another article, I Microsoft is chasing this dream too. It's extremely profitable, but very bad in most ways for users.
(Score: 5, Interesting) by mojo chan on Friday March 20 2015, @08:25AM
His real talent was in building and maintaining the reality distortion field. Even the submission has been sucked in, using the language he managed to associate with himself and Apple: "breathtaking", "visionary". If you read reviews of Apple products, particularly ones written while he was still alive and shortly after one of his speeches, they are full of worlds like "beautiful", "surprising" and always gushing over the design elements. It's like some kind of circle-jerk where everyone feels good about their mutual appreciation of Apple products, as if it somehow enriches their lives.
const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
(Score: 2, Insightful) by rondon on Friday March 20 2015, @12:11PM
This is what I don't get, the rush to proclaim that, "Apple product X has changed my life for the better!" Why does anyone feel the need to proselytize about a phone, or a tablet? When does it stop being tech and start being religion?
Full disclosure: I hate Apple not because of what they are for the people who truly love their services, but for the distortion they have had over the entire field of handheld computing. I want my smartphone to do what I want, not what some jerk-off in Korea/China/wherever wants the damn thing to do TO me.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by demonlapin on Friday March 20 2015, @06:33PM
(Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday March 20 2015, @01:05PM
The kinda-irony? I'm typing this on a PowerMac (running Debian :-| ) (But hey - at least I can swap monitors if I want to on this one, unlike some previous visionary Macs.) (Note - I did not pay for this Mac. Apple have never received a single penny from me.)
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
(Score: 2) by dry on Saturday March 21 2015, @05:39AM
In a way he did change computing and software. I remember when he said users didn't need colour and users only needed a closed box and he changed Apple from a company that produced open hardware and published the source code for the ROM to a closed company.
Now Apple is the most valuable company in the world so obviously the closed model has been a success. At least for some definitions of success.