Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Friday March 20 2015, @05:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the whatever-happened-to-OCR? dept.

The National Archives [USA] are asking for volunteers to transcribe thousands of pages of declassified CIA documents. To assist, you have to log in to the National Archives Catalog. The endeavour is part of Sunshine Week which is an open-government initiative, started by a group of newspaper editors, to educate people about the importance of government transparency and the dangers of excessive state secrecy.

You can browse some of the raw documents here.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Pseudonymous Coward on Friday March 20 2015, @10:44AM

    by Pseudonymous Coward (4624) on Friday March 20 2015, @10:44AM (#160326)

    This gem. [archives.gov]

    "█████████████ WEAPONS"?
    How much you wanna bet that's either "biochemical" or "thermonuclear"?

    "Future deployments will be approved by Presidential memorandum to the Secretary of Defense."
    Well...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by prospectacle on Friday March 20 2015, @12:27PM

    by prospectacle (3422) on Friday March 20 2015, @12:27PM (#160352) Journal

    That's interesting. Given it's a fixed width font, we can narrow down the possibilities (assuming that's a scan of the original document, and they hadn't known when writing it which words were going to be redacted and so added extra spaces or anything).

    It has to be exactly 18 letters long. That rules out "nuclear", "chemical", or "biological". What could it be?

    --
    If a plan isn't flexible it isn't realistic
    • (Score: 1) by Pseudonymous Coward on Friday March 20 2015, @12:39PM

      by Pseudonymous Coward (4624) on Friday March 20 2015, @12:39PM (#160355)

      It is likely to be exactly or less than 18 letters long, they can black out more than is necessary to throw people off trying to do what we're doing. ('context analysis'?)
      It's also a possibility that the word is longer than the blacked text and it's been whited out or photo shopped.

      The GIMP has a grid tool that is excellent for trying to determine the length of the blacked out text.

    • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Friday March 20 2015, @11:31PM

      by krishnoid (1156) on Friday March 20 2015, @11:31PM (#160612)

      nuclear/biological ?
      012345789012345678

      • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Friday March 20 2015, @11:35PM

        by krishnoid (1156) on Friday March 20 2015, @11:35PM (#160613)

        And I missed a number. How about:

        nuclear or chemical
        0123456789012345678

        • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Saturday March 21 2015, @10:40AM

          by deimtee (3272) on Saturday March 21 2015, @10:40AM (#160743) Journal

          If you look closely, there is the edge of a couple of descenders above the i and t in restricted.
          Could be g, j, p, q, or y.
          q and j are not visible in the document.
          The one above i doesn't seem to match g, p, or y. It is offset in a way that might match q, or it might be an artifact.
          The second one seems to be a y

          _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ? _ y _ _ _ _ _

          The second body redaction is probably "facilities".

          --
          No problem is insoluble, but at Ksp = 2.943×10−25 Mercury Sulphide comes close.
  • (Score: 2) by darkfeline on Friday March 20 2015, @06:32PM

    by darkfeline (1030) on Friday March 20 2015, @06:32PM (#160520) Homepage

    What the hell is the point of "declassifying" that document? They may as well "declassify" everything and link 1 billion copies of a black image.

    --
    Join the SDF Public Access UNIX System today!
  • (Score: 1) by forkazoo on Saturday March 21 2015, @09:12AM

    by forkazoo (2561) on Saturday March 21 2015, @09:12AM (#160733)

    Given the phrasing, Nukes seem unlikely. My guess would be either chemical or biological. Nukes were already in large scale production, deployed outside of the US, and issued to combat units for decades by the time of that memo. If it were Nukes, it would have to be something very specific, but even the very classified backpack nukes were at least deployed to Germany, so it doesn't really fit. It may be "chemical/biological" but it might also be something very specific that won't be obvious without some context.