Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by hubie on Monday February 09, @08:54PM   Printer-friendly

Five other states have introduced similar bills recently as data center development skyrockets:

On Friday, New York State Senators Liz Krueger and Kristen Gonzales introduced a bill that would stop the issuance of permits for new data centers for at least three years and ninety days to give time for impact assessments and to update regulations. The bill would require the Department of Environmental Conservation and Public Service Commissions to issue impact statements and reports during the pause, along with any new orders or regulations that they deem necessary to minimize data centers' impacts on the environment and consumers in New York.

The bill would require these departments to study data centers' water, electricity and gas usage, and their impact on the rates of these resources, among other things. The bill, citing a Bloomberg analysis, notes that, "Nationally, household electricity rates increased 13 percent in 2025, largely driven by the development of data centers." New York is the sixth state this year to introduce a bill aiming to put the brakes on data centers, following in the footsteps of Georgia, Maryland, Oklahoma, Vermont and Virginia, according to Wired. It's still very much in the early stages, and is now with the Senate Environmental Conservation Committee for consideration.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by Bentonite on Tuesday February 10, @01:49AM (1 child)

    by Bentonite (56146) on Tuesday February 10, @01:49AM (#1433193)

    Full gigabit fibre installation in the USA still hasn't been completed, even though ISP's have been paid 400+ billion USD to do so, which was more than enough to cover install costs several times over (according to "THE BOOK OF BROKEN PROMISES: $400 BILLION BROADBAND SCANDAL & FREE THE NET").

    There's still dark fibre in many places available and when capacity is reached, you don't need to replace the fibre - you swap out the transceivers with faster ones and re-use the old ones elsewhere.

    It is impossible to cleanly frack - once those proprietary fracking fluids are pumped down, they eventually end up in the water table, as well as whatever contaminants are in the gas too (it turns out that fracturing rock puts fractures in what used to be impermeable rock).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Interesting=1, Informative=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 10, @02:05AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 10, @02:05AM (#1433196)

    https://www.texasmonthly.com/news-politics/permian-fracking-recycling-produced-water/ [texasmonthly.com]
    Even Texas is concerned about fracking waste products.