SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
MotorTrend reports https://www.motortrend.com/news/kia-plant-solar-power-hail-protection that the Kia assembly plant in Georgia suffered very expensive hail damage to new cars waiting to be shipped, back in a storm in 2023. The fix is a massive raised solar array of 3.2 million square feet (300,000 meters^2) over the car park/storage area.
The system has about 17,000 solar panels on the columns of a structure that is large enough to protect about 15,000 vehicles from the elements until they are loaded onto trucks or rail cars for delivery. Hail damage costs billions of dollars a year.
The panels are not all connected yet. Construction began in 2024 and the goal was to be done in the first quarter of 2026 but panels are still being installed. It should be finished this spring.
VPS [Vehicle Protection Structures] has provided this kind of protection to dealerships, but this is the first large-scale execution for an assembly plant.
The partnership is also working with Georgia Power to optimize energy production and integrate the power generated by the solar panels into the plant. The panels will be capable of supplying 10 percent of the plant's energy needs. The project also provided credits under the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act until that act was terminated.
Pics at the link, sort of like large "pop-up" shelters. To your AC submitter it's quite attractive.
Insuring the solar panels for hail damage seems like it would be cheaper than insurance to cover the same area of cars.
(Score: 3, Insightful) by Spamalope on Tuesday March 03, @02:05PM (2 children)
They made large canopy structures that require beefy posts.
Since the posts were already required, they extended them upward a bit and added guy stabilized single pole mounts for the panels.
I count 14 largish panels per pole. If they're 400w panels, that's 5,600w per post.
Trans-shipment lots are huge. There is nothing fake about this. Whether it's a good idea 100% depends on how much it costs over simply adding the covers.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by PiMuNu on Tuesday March 03, @02:19PM (1 child)
> Whether it's a good idea 100% depends on how much it costs over simply adding the covers.
Here in UK, where electricity costs are significantly higher than in US, we have landowners abandoning farming to put in solar panels.
(Score: 2) by driverless on Wednesday March 04, @12:07AM
You have to look at the other side as well, farming returns $x per unit square, often just above zero or even negative in bad years, while solar pretty reliably returns > $x per unit square for next to zero effort apart from the initial investment.