Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 13 submissions in the queue.
posted by hubie on Monday March 02, @08:12PM   Printer-friendly
from the dual-purpose dept.

MotorTrend reports https://www.motortrend.com/news/kia-plant-solar-power-hail-protection that the Kia assembly plant in Georgia suffered very expensive hail damage to new cars waiting to be shipped, back in a storm in 2023. The fix is a massive raised solar array of 3.2 million square feet (300,000 meters^2) over the car park/storage area.

The system has about 17,000 solar panels on the columns of a structure that is large enough to protect about 15,000 vehicles from the elements until they are loaded onto trucks or rail cars for delivery. Hail damage costs billions of dollars a year.

The panels are not all connected yet. Construction began in 2024 and the goal was to be done in the first quarter of 2026 but panels are still being installed. It should be finished this spring.

VPS [Vehicle Protection Structures] has provided this kind of protection to dealerships, but this is the first large-scale execution for an assembly plant.

The partnership is also working with Georgia Power to optimize energy production and integrate the power generated by the solar panels into the plant. The panels will be capable of supplying 10 percent of the plant's energy needs. The project also provided credits under the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act until that act was terminated.

Pics at the link, sort of like large "pop-up" shelters. To your AC submitter it's quite attractive.

Insuring the solar panels for hail damage seems like it would be cheaper than insurance to cover the same area of cars.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by PiMuNu on Tuesday March 03, @02:19PM (1 child)

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Tuesday March 03, @02:19PM (#1435563)

    > Whether it's a good idea 100% depends on how much it costs over simply adding the covers.

    Here in UK, where electricity costs are significantly higher than in US, we have landowners abandoning farming to put in solar panels.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by driverless on Wednesday March 04, @12:07AM

    by driverless (4770) on Wednesday March 04, @12:07AM (#1435622)

    You have to look at the other side as well, farming returns $x per unit square, often just above zero or even negative in bad years, while solar pretty reliably returns > $x per unit square for next to zero effort apart from the initial investment.