Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Thursday March 26 2015, @04:19PM   Printer-friendly
from the trust-no-one dept.

BBC reports the co-pilot of the Germanwings flight that crashed in the Alps intentionally locked the pilot out of the cabin and initiated the flight's descent into the ground:

The co-pilot of the Germanwings flight that crashed in the French Alps, named as Andreas Lubitz, appeared to want to "destroy the plane", officials said.

Marseille prosecutor Brice Robin, citing information from the "black box" voice recorder, said the co-pilot was alone in the cockpit.

He intentionally started a descent while the pilot was locked out.

Mr Robin said there was "absolute silence in the cockpit" as the pilot fought to re-enter it.

Air traffic controllers made repeated attempts to contact the aircraft, but to no avail, he said.

The story seems SN-worthy because it is an object lesson in the consequences for our lives when we put complex machines and systems into the hands of others. In this case it was a trained pilot who killed a plane full of people who were powerless to stop him. Another example could be engineers who sabotage a dam and wipe out entire communities downstream. We mostly don't think about stuff like this because there is an invisible web of trust, sometimes called a "social contract," that leads people to get on a plane, or go to work, or take their kids to school without giving it a second thought. But when that social contract unravels, all bets are off...

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Hartree on Thursday March 26 2015, @06:00PM

    by Hartree (195) on Thursday March 26 2015, @06:00PM (#162869)

    At its root, this is a human problem. For whatever reason, evil, medical, or stupid, sometimes, people will sometimes intentionally do harmful things. Technical means, like locks on an armored door aren't a complete solution. They can't possibly take into account all possible situations.

    You can try to reduce the risk, but you can't eliminate it. The US solution of requiring two people in the cockpit reduces it more, but can't stop a pilot and copilot who are cooperating in crashing the plane. At that point, I don't think anything really can without making the plane completely self flying and allowing no overrides. And obviously, that has problems as well.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2