Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Dopefish on Saturday March 15 2014, @07:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the who-cares-about-future-generations dept.

Papas Fritas writes "Megan Gannon reports on Live Science that, according to a new poll, although most Americans believe the effects from global warming will take hold during their lifetime, they don't expect these changes to pose a serious threat to their way of life. A Gallup survey found that 54 percent of Americans believe global warming is already impacting the planet; another three percent think these effects will occur in a few years and eight percent think these effects will occur in their lifetime.

Meanwhile, 16 percent think global warming's effects will happen sometime after they die, and 18 percent don't expect these effects to ever take hold. But the way the public perceives the reality of global warming seems to be somewhat disconnected from how they perceive the threat of a warming world. Just 36 percent of people in the United States think global warming will eventually disrupt their way of life, they survey found.

Age also affected how people saw the effects of a changing climate. Among Americans ages 18 to 29, Gallup found that 78 percent thought the effects of global warming were already occurring or would occur during their lifetime. Just 47 percent of seniors (those 65 and over) said the same. Gallup officials say their poll's results could explain why Americans don't politically prioritize environmental issues; instead, their top concerns are issues that will affect them immediately, like the economy and health care.

"Whatever the reasons, those who argue climate change is the top problem of our age are no doubt aghast that even now, in 2014, Americans are not more worried or concerned than they are. A lot of the efforts to raise concern levels and awareness to date have obviously not worked well. It may be that new tactics are needed. So far, however, even if it is a case of whistling past the graveyard, Americans are clearly more focused on other issues.""

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Open4D on Saturday March 15 2014, @12:22PM

    by Open4D (371) on Saturday March 15 2014, @12:22PM (#16819) Journal

    When they can reliably make predictions that are borne out by actual data, I'm willing to listen.

    They have made predictions for what will happen to our planet if we keep emitting 29 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere per year. This is one science experiment I very much hope we don't proceed with.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 5, Funny) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday March 15 2014, @01:09PM

    by The Mighty Buzzard (18) Subscriber Badge <themightybuzzard@proton.me> on Saturday March 15 2014, @01:09PM (#16827) Homepage Journal
    It's a necessary one though, so this doesn't have to happen again. Right now we have all the certainty of a Christianity vs. Islam debate, with just as many facts and even less civility. If we were to stop producing carbon on this level without any proof, it could all very well happen again in another hundred years or so. Once it's a tested theory though, deniers will be few and in the same category of brilliance as people who think the moon landing was a hoax.
    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Cold Fjord on Saturday March 15 2014, @05:41PM

      by Cold Fjord (129) on Saturday March 15 2014, @05:41PM (#16883)

      all the certainty of a Christianity vs. Islam debate, with just as many facts and even less civility

      Which debate caused an airplane to be flown into a building? Figure that out, then tell me which debate is less civil.

      • (Score: 3, Informative) by sumdumass on Saturday March 15 2014, @07:15PM

        by sumdumass (413) on Saturday March 15 2014, @07:15PM (#16904)

        all the certainty of a Christianity vs. Islam debate, with just as many facts and even less civility

        Which debate caused an airplane to be flown into a building? Figure that out, then tell me which debate is less civil.

        From the World Health Organization [who.int]:

        Worldwide, outdoor air pollution contributes to 5% of all cardiopulmonary deaths

        More people are dying from air pollution than over a plane hitting a building.