Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 19 submissions in the queue.
posted by hubie on Sunday June 28, @12:19PM   Printer-friendly

https://www.newsweek.com/cost-me-the-election-data-centers-trigger-voter-backlash-12118327

A wave of voter anger over massive data center projects is beginning to reshape U.S. politics, with local officials and senior lawmakers losing elections after backing controversial developments tied to the artificial intelligence boom.

In Utah on Wednesday, State Senate President J. Stuart Adams—one of the most powerful Republicans in the state—lost his primary election after supporting a major data center development near the Great Salt Lake, in one of the clearest signs yet of the growing political risks tied to the industry.

At the local level, the fallout was just as direct. "Do I think that the data center vote cost me the election? Yes I do," former Box Elder County Commissioner Lee Perry said after conceding his primary race, after voting to advance the same project.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by krishnoid on Sunday June 28, @04:37PM

    by krishnoid (1156) on Sunday June 28, @04:37PM (#1446541)

    "Do I think that the data center vote cost me the election? Yes I do,"

    "Do I think that supporting a large, ugly, loud, permanent, exceedingly visible, residential-resource-diverting, invisible-public-utility (not like Amazon) is the kind of political position that repulses people enough to redirect their voting patterns? Well, when you put it that way, I do now"

    i mean, if they instead made it at least one of:

    • small
    • attractive
    • quiet
    • temporary
    • low-impact
    • providing a visible, discretionary consumer-level service

    the electorate might have swallowed it. But ... seriously?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Insightful=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5