Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Sunday June 28, @12:19PM   Printer-friendly

https://www.newsweek.com/cost-me-the-election-data-centers-trigger-voter-backlash-12118327

A wave of voter anger over massive data center projects is beginning to reshape U.S. politics, with local officials and senior lawmakers losing elections after backing controversial developments tied to the artificial intelligence boom.

In Utah on Wednesday, State Senate President J. Stuart Adams—one of the most powerful Republicans in the state—lost his primary election after supporting a major data center development near the Great Salt Lake, in one of the clearest signs yet of the growing political risks tied to the industry.

At the local level, the fallout was just as direct. "Do I think that the data center vote cost me the election? Yes I do," former Box Elder County Commissioner Lee Perry said after conceding his primary race, after voting to advance the same project.


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by aafcac on Wednesday July 01, @03:21AM (1 child)

    by aafcac (17646) on Wednesday July 01, @03:21AM (#1446828)

    They're not a unconstitutional, SCOTUS ruled them to be, which is kind of funny as the court gave itself the right to declare things to be unconstitutional, not the constitution itself.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday July 01, @05:17AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday July 01, @05:17AM (#1446831) Journal

    They're not a unconstitutional, SCOTUS ruled them to be,

    Already explained why.

    as the court gave itself the right to declare things to be unconstitutional, not the constitution itself.

    Who should be doing it instead? Trump perhaps? It's one of those implied powers you hear about.