Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Saturday March 28 2015, @09:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the Don't-fence-me-in dept.

Ars Technica is reporting on new regulations to limit region-based restrictions in the European Union:

At the heart of the European Union lies the Single Market—the possibility for people to buy and sell goods and services anywhere in the EU. So it is ironic that the European sector least constrained by geography—the digital market—is also the least unified. To remedy that situation, the European Commission has announced its Digital Single Market Strategy, which addresses three main areas.

The first is "Better access for consumers and businesses to digital goods and services" and includes two of the thorniest issues: geo-blocking and copyright. As the EU's strategy notes, "too many Europeans cannot use online services that are available in other EU countries, often without any justification; or they are re-routed to a local store with different prices. Such discrimination cannot exist in a Single Market."

There is strong resistance to removing geo-blocking, particularly from copyright companies that have traditionally sold rights on a national basis and which therefore want geo-blocking to enforce that fragmentation. The Pirate Party Member of the European Parliament (MEP), Julia Reda, quoted a fellow MEP justifying geo-blocking as follows: "I can’t buy Finnish bread in any German supermarket or bakery. Far too few people here would buy it, so the market doesn't offer it to me. And you don’t see me demanding that the European Commission bloody-well make that product available to me."

Julia Reda responded to those who defend geo-blocking by actually buying Finnish bread online without incident or issue.

The European Union's Digital Single Market Strategy covers several other areas, including Telecom/network investment and management, copyright reform, and future goals for a single EU digital market.

As an American, it's hard to believe government could possibly work on behalf of voters, so let's see if this initiative can make it into law. But it is an enticing idea.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by anubi on Sunday March 29 2015, @02:10AM

    by anubi (2828) on Sunday March 29 2015, @02:10AM (#163689) Journal

    Very true, but the problem is we will not organize like a business and present a unified front to a politician, telling him if he fails to implement (thing) by (date), he had better find another line of work.

    Business has no problem using this paradigm on employees. They call it "leadership skill". They actually send perfectly good people to take classes in these techniques.

    But the public, by and large, won't use this technique on the people they elect to represent them.

    And that's why we get what we get... all run over with one sided law and our side not stood up for.

    Its high time we drop this "honorable mr. so-and-so" bit and start asking pointed questions prior to elections, and hold them accountable.

    Believe me, "they" have absolutely no problems holding US accountable!

    --
    "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]