Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Saturday March 28 2015, @09:26PM   Printer-friendly
from the Don't-fence-me-in dept.

Ars Technica is reporting on new regulations to limit region-based restrictions in the European Union:

At the heart of the European Union lies the Single Market—the possibility for people to buy and sell goods and services anywhere in the EU. So it is ironic that the European sector least constrained by geography—the digital market—is also the least unified. To remedy that situation, the European Commission has announced its Digital Single Market Strategy, which addresses three main areas.

The first is "Better access for consumers and businesses to digital goods and services" and includes two of the thorniest issues: geo-blocking and copyright. As the EU's strategy notes, "too many Europeans cannot use online services that are available in other EU countries, often without any justification; or they are re-routed to a local store with different prices. Such discrimination cannot exist in a Single Market."

There is strong resistance to removing geo-blocking, particularly from copyright companies that have traditionally sold rights on a national basis and which therefore want geo-blocking to enforce that fragmentation. The Pirate Party Member of the European Parliament (MEP), Julia Reda, quoted a fellow MEP justifying geo-blocking as follows: "I can’t buy Finnish bread in any German supermarket or bakery. Far too few people here would buy it, so the market doesn't offer it to me. And you don’t see me demanding that the European Commission bloody-well make that product available to me."

Julia Reda responded to those who defend geo-blocking by actually buying Finnish bread online without incident or issue.

The European Union's Digital Single Market Strategy covers several other areas, including Telecom/network investment and management, copyright reform, and future goals for a single EU digital market.

As an American, it's hard to believe government could possibly work on behalf of voters, so let's see if this initiative can make it into law. But it is an enticing idea.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 29 2015, @10:43PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday March 29 2015, @10:43PM (#163978)

    You are making the exact same mistake as the poster I replied to. The government does X, which benefits the people, so the government generally benefits the people.

    I repeat: "With mass surveillance (from the NSA's mass surveillance to things like cameras everywhere in public places), the TSA, DUI checkpoints, numerous absurd wars, the drug war, and a host of other nonsense, there is no way they are working in the people's interest. Building more roads will not make up for disrespecting people's most basic liberties and blatantly ignoring the constitution." As long as the government is violating people's fundamental liberties, they *cannot* be working for the people.

  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Monday March 30 2015, @02:02AM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Monday March 30 2015, @02:02AM (#164015)

    Please, don't put words in my mouth : ) I am not stupid. Pointing out all the three letter organizations that are screwing us over is wasted on me. I already know.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.