SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
A very interesting article was published in Phys.org about how modern life might be outpacing our mind, which evolved to deal with a simpler world:
The human brain evolved for a world of familiar faces, immediate threats and small social groups. But the world around us is changing far faster than human biology can keep pace. That mismatch may help explain some of the stress, loneliness and constant comparison people experience today.
The review, co-authored by Dr. Jose Yong, senior lecturer at James Cook University, Singapore, and Dr. Sarah Chan, research fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew Centre for Innovative Cities at SUTD, is published in Behavioral Sciences.
Evolutionary mismatch describes what happens when human instincts shaped in one kind of environment are forced to operate in a very different one. Humans evolved in smaller, close-knit groups, where danger, belonging, status and trust were read through familiar people and everyday face-to-face signals. [...]
Social media makes this mismatch especially visible. The urge to understand our place within a group may once have helped people maintain trust and cooperation among familiar faces. Today, that same instinct can be triggered by an endless stream of curated lives, achievements and status signals.
At the center of the paper is competition. Modern environments can intensify the feeling that others are judging, outperforming or leaving us behind. [...]
"Competition is not new, but modern life can make it feel constant," said Yong. "An evolutionary perspective may help explain why people respond so strongly to comparison and the fear of falling behind, even when those signals come from strangers or screens rather than a small social group."
The paper draws on existing research and theory rather than new data. It presents evolutionary mismatch as one way of understanding modern social and psychological problems, alongside psychological, social and economic explanations. These ideas will need to be tested through real-world research.
That matters because the response to modern stress cannot rest only on telling individuals to be more resilient. If environments are activating old instincts in new and unhelpful ways, then cities, workplaces, digital platforms and communities also need to be part of the solution. [...]
"Stress, loneliness and anxiety are often treated as personal or lifestyle problems," said Chan. "But they may also reflect a mismatch between the environments people live in and the conditions our minds and bodies evolved to navigate. That means we should think not only about individual resilience, but also about how cities and communities are designed."
None of this is an argument for returning to a simpler past or a suggestion that modern life is inherently broken. It is a case for designing the present more thoughtfully. Understanding where modern life conflicts with the conditions human beings evolved to navigate could help researchers, designers and policymakers create cities and communities that feel less alienating and more supportive of everyday well-being.
More information
Jose C. Yong et al, Evolutionary Mismatch, Stress, and Competition: Making Sense of Psychosocial Problems in the Polycrisis Era, Behavioral Sciences (2026). DOI: 10.3390/bs16050650
(Score: 5, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Monday July 06, @06:37PM (2 children)
When the telegraph started bringing news of the world instantly across hundreds of miles, that was an overnight jolt to brains that evolved across millennia to deal with first what their senses told them, and second what they heard communicated from others. Centuries earlier, the dead had started to speak more reliably and voluminously through mass produced books - much more information than was ever inscribed on stone tablets or other long lived (EXPENSIVE!) artifacts from the past. But, still, most people didn't read or write and continued to function on their own senses plus such word of mouth as they heard and trusted. Even in the 1700s, no one human mind could process and retain or even access all the knowledge available in the great libraries, most didn't even begin to try.
By the time radio was bringing news of "the great wars" into living rooms in real-time, the evolved brain was already overwhelmed. Many went into denial mode, unable to process the descriptions of the horrors unfolding elsewhere, even as their own husbands and sons experienced them firsthand, most filtered this - sheltered their homelands from graphic descriptions of what they had seen and experienced personally.
Television came within a generation, and this time the pictures are so easy to consume even people disinclined to read or write are now seeing and hearing "with their own senses" instant communications from places they have never been and likely will never be. After a generation or two, the content shown on television now regularly presents more information about more places than it is physically possible to travel to and experience in a lifetime. You can travel the globe, you can "visit all 205 countries" out there, but even the Principality of Monaco takes more than a week to experience more than superficially, and countries like Brazil and the United States and India, and China could take a lifetime just to experience all the various sub-cultures contained in a single one.
We've been overwhelmed for generations now, and denial is getting harder, so the denialists are going harder still - ignoring most of what they see and hear, focusing on their own world-view which, evolutionarily, can only relate to about 200 other people at a time - everyone else gets a stereotyped, pigeon-holed and pre-judged. But we're not presented with 200 people or less in our daily media immersions, we're told about events all over the globe involving thousands, millions, billions of people we likely will never meet personally.
Have we hit a tipping point? I say: nah, people were cracking up from the pressures of modern life 500+ years ago. The only thing more overwhelming than life in modern civilization? Life without the protections modern civilization affords to the vast majority of us.
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 06, @08:05PM (1 child)
I find modern communication speed a big stressor.
Something happens to someone else. The means now exist to make sure you know about it and are going through the obligatory social response rituals.
High speed transportation is also available for compliance with personal attendance, at a price "easily affordable over hundreds of "small monthly installments"", thanks to bankers, investors, and credit scoring .
Some will see this as "selfish", others will see it as "being financially responsible".
Yes, I do fear becoming a "debt slave", as once one owes a debt, one becomes a slave until that debt is paid. It's well known many rich people got that way by figuring out under what conditions people will sign themselves into debt. Meeting social expectations is high on that list.
(Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday July 06, @09:59PM
> the obligatory social response rituals.
I find those born post 1990 have an "evolved" sense of obligatory social response, maybe devolved, in any event: it's the ghost. Non response. As if it's normal to just compeltely ignore when somebody sends you an e-mail, or a text or whatever. It is one way of coping with the volume of things that reach their senses every minute of every waking hour...
> bankers, investors, and credit scoring .
Second order of business for the chief noodle: cooking down the financial sector to remove its associations with gambling, profiteering, loan sharking, etc.
🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]