Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 11 submissions in the queue.
posted by janrinok on Monday July 06, @01:42PM   Printer-friendly

A very interesting article was published in Phys.org about how modern life might be outpacing our mind, which evolved to deal with a simpler world:

The human brain evolved for a world of familiar faces, immediate threats and small social groups. But the world around us is changing far faster than human biology can keep pace. That mismatch may help explain some of the stress, loneliness and constant comparison people experience today.

The review, co-authored by Dr. Jose Yong, senior lecturer at James Cook University, Singapore, and Dr. Sarah Chan, research fellow at the Lee Kuan Yew Centre for Innovative Cities at SUTD, is published in Behavioral Sciences.

Evolutionary mismatch describes what happens when human instincts shaped in one kind of environment are forced to operate in a very different one. Humans evolved in smaller, close-knit groups, where danger, belonging, status and trust were read through familiar people and everyday face-to-face signals. [...]

Social media makes this mismatch especially visible. The urge to understand our place within a group may once have helped people maintain trust and cooperation among familiar faces. Today, that same instinct can be triggered by an endless stream of curated lives, achievements and status signals.

At the center of the paper is competition. Modern environments can intensify the feeling that others are judging, outperforming or leaving us behind. [...]

"Competition is not new, but modern life can make it feel constant," said Yong. "An evolutionary perspective may help explain why people respond so strongly to comparison and the fear of falling behind, even when those signals come from strangers or screens rather than a small social group."

The paper draws on existing research and theory rather than new data. It presents evolutionary mismatch as one way of understanding modern social and psychological problems, alongside psychological, social and economic explanations. These ideas will need to be tested through real-world research.

That matters because the response to modern stress cannot rest only on telling individuals to be more resilient. If environments are activating old instincts in new and unhelpful ways, then cities, workplaces, digital platforms and communities also need to be part of the solution. [...]

"Stress, loneliness and anxiety are often treated as personal or lifestyle problems," said Chan. "But they may also reflect a mismatch between the environments people live in and the conditions our minds and bodies evolved to navigate. That means we should think not only about individual resilience, but also about how cities and communities are designed."

None of this is an argument for returning to a simpler past or a suggestion that modern life is inherently broken. It is a case for designing the present more thoughtfully. Understanding where modern life conflicts with the conditions human beings evolved to navigate could help researchers, designers and policymakers create cities and communities that feel less alienating and more supportive of everyday well-being.

More information

Jose C. Yong et al, Evolutionary Mismatch, Stress, and Competition: Making Sense of Psychosocial Problems in the Polycrisis Era, Behavioral Sciences (2026). DOI: 10.3390/bs16050650


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by janrinok (52) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Monday July 06, @06:50PM (5 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday July 06, @06:50PM (#1447390) Journal

    Pretty sure even the half-smart ones have failed to quit comparing themselves to marketing personalities since Twiggy and before.

    --
    🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 06, @08:14PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 06, @08:14PM (#1447406)

    Yet another form of "Rank and Yank" practiced in the modern competitive workplace.

    Airline stewardess? Go for the twiggy. Minimize dead weight. One certainly doesn't want a 400 pound porker!

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by krishnoid on Monday July 06, @09:54PM (3 children)

    by krishnoid (1156) on Monday July 06, @09:54PM (#1447422)

    Makes you wonder who still reads People magazine, and what they get out of it.

    I bet the smart ones know if you really want do it right, go to a fan convention for something you enjoy and strike up a few conversations. That'll get your comparison game on at an industrial level.

    • (Score: 4, Insightful) by JoeMerchant on Monday July 06, @10:01PM (2 children)

      by JoeMerchant (3937) on Monday July 06, @10:01PM (#1447425) Journal

      I recommend "Wishful Drinking" for a little insight into "the privileged lives of the famous and connected."

      "I don't remember exactly when I started referring to signing autographs for money as a celebrity lap dance, but I'm sure it didn't take me long to come up with it. It's a lap dance without cash being placed in any underwear, and there's no pole—or is the pole represented by the pen?"

      --
      🌻🌻🌻🌻✌️ [google.com]
      • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Tuesday July 07, @05:47PM (1 child)

        by krishnoid (1156) on Tuesday July 07, @05:47PM (#1447571)

        Well, sort of. Except you can't sell a lap dance you got on the pre-owned enthusiast market. You also don't have to have it authenticated, I guess :0)