Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by janrinok on Monday March 30 2015, @05:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the Pete-Seeger-singing-"when-will-they-ever-learn?-when-will-they-ever-learn?" dept.

Alison Griswold writes that in an effort to improve its tanking image, SeaWorld launched a new advertising campaign this week to educate the public about its “leadership in the care of killer whales” and other work to protect whales in captivity and in the wild. As part of that head-on initiative, someone at SeaWorld decided to invite Twitter users to pose their questions to the company directly using the hashtag #AskSeaWorld. That was not a good idea as twitter users bashed Sea World relentlessly. "As easy as it is to make fun of SeaWorld here, the real question is why any company still thinks hosting an open Twitter forum could be good for public relations," writes Griswold. "So maybe SeaWorld’s social and PR folks just really have no idea what they’re doing. Even so, you’d think they’d have learned from the corporate failures before them."

Let’s review some of the times this has backfired, starting with the infamous McDonald’s #McDStories Twitter campaign of January 2012. Rather than prompting customers to share their heart-warming McDonald’s anecdotes, the hashtag gave critics a highly visible forum to share their top McDonald’s horror stories. MacDonalds pulled the campaign within two hours but they discovered that crowd-sourced campaigns are hard to control. Three years later the #McDStories hashtag is still gathering comments. "Twitter Q&As are a terrible idea.," concludes Griswold. "A well-meaning hashtag gives critics an easy way to assemble and voice their complaints in a public forum. Why companies still try them is a great mystery. Maybe they’ll all finally learn from SeaWorld and give this one horrible PR trick up for good."

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 31 2015, @02:06AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday March 31 2015, @02:06AM (#164601)

    "Maybe it's a rise in astroturfers, or maybe it's just a changing demographic for slashdot users, but it is definitely much blander."

    IMO it flat out sucks, corportate sock puppet accounts, people who continue to bash Linux and RMS but probably don't understand either. Do you think /. will ever host an .onion site?

    SN has made the bold move in the /. exodus and this includes hosting .onion hidden services. Search engines should learn from DDG's .onion site but most cling to how the web once was.

    Times have changed - sites like /. have to compete with Reddit, Ycombinator/hacker news, Schneier's blog with highly technical anonymous blog posts from the readers, large message forums, etc.

    Do you know what /. "feels" like to me? An empty house with a lot of rats coming in and sharing cheese and disease. We should all welcome SN with open arms.