Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by hubie on Tuesday September 01, @01:15PM   Printer-friendly
from the real-life-KSP dept.

The saying "cleared for takeoff" has a whole different meaning in space:

Historically, humankind has sent only one thing to the moon at a time so that it has the whole metaphorical highway to itself. But NASA's planned moon base is expected to have a lot more concurrent traffic in the future, which means it's time to start writing rules for a busier road. Engineers from Texas A&M, Purdue and NASA's Johnson Space Center joined forces to help write some of those rules.

The system is outlined in a recent study, and it's a lot more complex than one would think. Gateway and other spacecraft orbiting the moon are expected to use the near-rectilinear halo orbit, which takes spacecraft around both poles of the moon.

This is pretty simple for a single space station like the now-defunct Gateway space station, for which this control system was designed, but it gets complicated quickly when you have the Orion crew capsule, uncrewed cargo ships and lunar landers all sharing the same orbit, thereby necessitating the need for an air traffic control system similar to an airport on Earth. 

"Collisions and serious damages could happen. To ensure crew safety and mission success, effective traffic management in the NRHO is crucial," Diane Davis, associate professor of space engineering at Texas A&M and an author of the study, said in a statement. "The future of lunar explorations depends as much on the traffic management as it does on the rocket science."

[...] There isn’t anything tangible that you can see with this traffic control system, but if you've ever flown in an airplane before, you have experienced it. Air traffic control on Earth is an intricate dance that helps airplane pilots know where to fly and where to land without colliding into other aircraft. That means managing holding patterns so airplanes don't collide midair, assigning runways and making sure the sky is clear for aircraft taking off.

The control system for the moon isn't much different in terms of basic functionality. Spacecraft coming and going might be headed for the surface or loitering around waiting for their chance to head back to Earth. These spacecraft have to be managed just like aircraft or they'll eventually crash into each other, which is about as devastating as you can imagine. They also have to conserve fuel to keep costs low.

"Larger orbits at the moon that are suitable for staging an Orion and lander mission to the surface take many hours or days to make (a) revolution around the moon," Davis told CNET in an email. "In order to keep propellant costs low, often there are particular locations along the orbit where it is most efficient to leave your loiter station and particular points where you want to meet up."

[...] The NRHO is not the most hospitable orbit. Spacecraft are subjected to gravity from the moon, Earth and other sources from deep space. They have to adjust constantly to avoid crashing into one another, falling into the moon or drifting into space. The new control system takes the NRHO's quirks into account and successfully simulated multiple spacecraft in the same orbit without them crashing into each other. 

Why pick such a difficult orbit? NASA says the NRHO grants enough access to the lunar surface to send and receive shipments to the moon, but is far enough away from the lunar surface to not require constant fuel to avoid being dragged down by the moon's gravity.

"Every spacecraft is constantly moving," Davis said. "It's a Goldilocks zone of keeping 'parked' vehicles far enough from each other to be safe, but close enough to their destination so that resources are used effectively."

An interesting tidbit is that NRHO was chosen for the Gateway space station. NASA canceled the space station to skip directly to the moon base, so Davis says the agency is now considering other orbits since it doesn't have to deal with a space station anymore, but the research still applies to whatever NASA chooses to do. 

"To enable the ambitious lunar missions planned by NASA, bold new mission designs are being created," Davis said. "These designs take advantage of the opportunities presented by the gravitational tug-of-war in cislunar space: These orbits often allow significant propellant savings and opportunities that just aren't available with more familiar low Earth or low lunar orbits."

The traffic control system is getting its first test with the Capstone 02 mission, which is expected to launch sometime next year, per Davis. It'll get further testing with the next Artemis mission, which is also set for launch in 2027. 


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only. Log in and try again!
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Tuesday September 01, @07:54PM (1 child)

    by Gaaark (41) on Tuesday September 01, @07:54PM (#1452776) Journal

    What does it matter when budget cuts and a-hole presidents fire everybody?

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. I have always been here. ---Gaaark 2.0 --
    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Wednesday September 02, @08:45AM

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday September 02, @08:45AM (#1452825) Journal
      There's a lot of stuff that happens outside of government. Even if NASA flames out from Trumpian shenanigans - assuming you don't consider it to have already flamed out some point in the 1980s or 1990s - there are other parties that could use this knowledge.
(1)