Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by hubie on Wednesday September 02, @08:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the Stallman-is-right dept.

Christine Hall of FOSS Force has interviewed Richard Stallman with a series of seven questions. The interview wraps up with a question about LLMs and a question about service as a software substitute which leads to a discussion about digital surveillance.

Let’s contrast this with traditional systems of age verification to see how much worse this is. When you buy alcoholic beverages, a store clerk will ask to see your ID, but won’t record your identity, only take note of your age. That practice respects your privacy; its surveillance impact is null. But digital age verification systems record who you are, and precisely everything you do.

At 73 years old, I am sure all the sites that do age verification would rule I am old enough. But doing the age verification would give them my name or an ID number, and I refuse to give them that.

Because of my age, I am entitled to a discount card for the Boston trains and buses. But the card would record my identity every time I board a subway train or bus. I would rather pay full fare than submit to that.

I don’t own a car, or want to, but we need to stop cars from reporting where people go. I hope to find a mechanic who will work out how to convert connected cars into “disconnected cars.” I think it could be done by wrapping some sort of metal sheets around the antennas that transmit privacy-violating data, or receive GPS. Or perhaps just unscrewing them. To do navigation, use a stand-alone GPS receiver that isn’t connected to the car’s surveillance system.

One of the dangers of tech companies storing your personal data — and personal data about you — in their servers is that agents of repression can get that data from the company without even informing you.

For more about digital surveillance, see
https://gnu.org/philosophy/surveillance-vs-democracy.html.

One long-running theme which RMS emphasizes is that software freedom remains a moral issue.

Previously:
(2023) The Four Freedoms and The One Obligation of Free Software
(2018) Happy 35th Birthday GNU!
(2018) RMS on a Radical Proposal to Keep Your Personal Data Safe
(2017) The Free Software Movement is Barking Up the Wrong Tree
(2017) US Court Upholds Enforceability of GNU GPL as Both a License and a Contract
(2015) GNU Prophet Richard Stallman Calls Windows and MacOS Malware


Original Submission

 
This discussion was created by hubie (1068) for logged-in users only, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Username on Thursday September 03, @02:16PM

    by Username (4557) on Thursday September 03, @02:16PM (#1452910)

    >You are under no obligation to make it easy for the prosecution by keeping a log of your whereabouts

    My point is the logs would help the defense. It's harder for the operator to spin their lies. Sure, they could steal my rifle while I'm gone and plant it at the scene, but if my dashcam proves I was somewhere else they will have to shift the narrative to fit. If they do it too many times people notice and the psyop fails.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2