Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 9 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Saturday April 04 2015, @06:12AM   Printer-friendly
from the people-are-getting-amped-up dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes in with an article from Vice.com.

A generous state tax break has helped make Georgia the number two state for electric vehicles, and made Atlanta the top market for the compact Nissan Leaf. Both the Leaf and the higher-end Tesla sedans are now common sights in and around metro Atlanta, where more than 10,500 are registered.

But this year, Georgia lawmakers needed to raise nearly $1 billion to patch up crumbling roads, highways, and bridges. So they are pulling the plug on that $5,000 tax credit — a move budget analysts say will contribute $66 million to the state's coffers in 2016 and nearly $190 million by 2020.

But it gets worse for electric vehicle (EV) boosters. Legislators are adding a $200-a-year annual fee for owners to offset the loss of gasoline taxes that drivers would otherwise pay to maintain roads.

The Economist has a breakdown of the current system of the tax credits and the expected economic impact of the changes.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Non Sequor on Saturday April 04 2015, @11:26AM

    by Non Sequor (1005) on Saturday April 04 2015, @11:26AM (#166365) Journal

    Sometimes the ability to convince other people to buy in to your solution is a constraint on the forms your solution can take.

    One of the opposing theories to what you laid out might be that tax rates are sticky in that there is resistance to increasing them and there is a tendency to redirect revenue towards other projects rather than lowering them. From that perspective, an imperfect use tax may in some cases be better at dedicating revenue to a variable expense tied to that use than an earmark from general revenue even if the general revenue earmark can be directly adjusted for measured changes in infrastructure cost.

    Working from that perspective, when the imperfection in your use tax becomes larger in an unanticipated way, you now have a hole in your budget. The immediate response is to patch it.

    --
    Write your congressman. Tell him he sucks.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3