Justin Gillis writes in the NYT that as drought strikes California, residents "can't help but notice the substantial reservoir of untapped water lapping at their shores — 187 quintillion gallons of it, more or less, shimmering invitingly in the sun."
Once dismissed as too expensive and harmful to the environment, desalination is getting a second look. [...] A $1 billion desalination plant to supply booming San Diego County is under construction and due to open as early as November, providing a major test of whether California cities will be able to resort to the ocean to solve their water woes. [...] "It was not an easy decision to build this plant," says Mark Weston, chairman of the agency that supplies water to towns in San Diego County. "But it is turning out to be a spectacular choice. What we thought was on the expensive side 10 years ago is now affordable."
Carlsbad's product will sell for around $2,000 per acre-foot (the amount used by two five-person U.S. households per year), which is 80 percent more than what the county pays for treated water from outside the area. Water bills already average about $75 a month and the new plant will drive them up by $5 or so to secure a new supply equal to about 7 or 8 percent of the county's water consumption.
Critics say the plant will use a huge amount of electricity, increasing the carbon dioxide emissions that cause global warming, which further strains water supplies. And local environmental groups, which have fought the plant, fear a substantial impact on sea life. "There is just a lot more that can be done on both the conservation side and the water-recycling side before you get to [desalination]," says Rick Wilson, coastal management coordinator with the environmental group Surfrider Foundation. "We feel, in a lot of cases, that we haven't really explored all of those options."
(Score: 3, Informative) by mtrycz on Sunday April 12 2015, @08:47PM
I don't know the details, and could be plain wrong, but discussion here on Soylent on ths topic a while ago pointed to the problem not being of the engeneering kind, but economic.
Can't find the comment now, but the point was that the water is sufficient, but it's sold to farmers for a very low price, they can farm the hell out of the land with it. Since it isn't abbundance, market "laws" would say that the price of water should rise, but a subtle "please" from a few big farmers to a few big decision makers keep it low.
Hence the shortage.
In capitalist America, ads view YOU!
(Score: 1) by Natales on Sunday April 12 2015, @09:22PM
The Wikipedia entry [wikipedia.org] has some interesting numbers on the actual costs: "Achievable costs in 2013 range from 0.45 to 1 US$/cubic metre (2 to 4 US$/kgal). (1 cubic meter is about 264 gallons.)".