Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mattie_p on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the conspiracy-or-consensus dept.

AudioGuy writes:

"You heard it here first. According to Natural News, a NASA report has verified that carbon dioxide actually cools the atmosphere.

Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA's Langley Research Center. As it turns out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence."

[Ed. note] I'm going to post this, because why not argue science that has been settled? Also, we needed to test the algorithm that generated mod points by sparking conversation. This was as good a way as any to get posts quickly. Sorry if you thought SoylentNews really endorsed this. ~Mattie_p

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by mrbluze on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:48AM

    by mrbluze (49) on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:48AM (#220) Journal
    Anyone have a link to the NASA report in its fullness?? My friends at work will laugh when I tell them "I read on the alpha testing page of this awesome site we are making, which was quoting natural news, which was quoting NASA ... "
    --
    Do it yourself, 'cause no one else will do it yourself.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:53AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:53AM (#222)
    Since when do we read articles around here? Only editors do that! Shut up and start arguing, already.
    • (Score: 1) by Vanderhoth on Sunday February 16 2014, @10:26AM

      by Vanderhoth (61) on Sunday February 16 2014, @10:26AM (#249)
      Peeeewwwww!!! I thought things were going to be different here. I'm a little embarrassed I tried to read the article and just found a bunch of broken or circular links for the articles "sources".
      --
      "Now we know", "And knowing is half the battle". -G.I. Joooooe
  • (Score: 1) by AudioGuy on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:57AM

    by AudioGuy (24) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:57AM (#223) Journal

    "As reported by Principia Scientific International (PSI), Martin Mlynczak and his colleagues over at NASA tracked infrared emissions from the earth's upper atmosphere during and following a recent solar storm that took place between March 8-10. What they found was that the vast majority of energy released from the sun during this immense coronal mass ejection (CME) was reflected back up into space rather than deposited into earth's lower atmosphere."

    Should be a cinch to find in such a respectable journal.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:38AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:38AM (#235)
    Since when do we RTFA around here? Get off my lawn, newbie!
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 18 2014, @11:14AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday February 18 2014, @11:14AM (#1527)

      and here i was thinking all along that RTFA stood for "ream that fucking asshole"

  • (Score: 1) by CoolHand on Monday February 17 2014, @01:40PM

    by CoolHand (438) on Monday February 17 2014, @01:40PM (#678) Journal
    The link for the nasa article is at the bottom of the article.. http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-na sa/2012/22mar_saber/ [nasa.gov]

    (the link in the natural news article doesn't actually go there, but a copy and paste works)

    The article is from 2012, and draws no overarching conclusions on global warming itself, but the quotes in the natural news article seem accurate...

    --
    Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job-Douglas Adams
    • (Score: 1) by Namarrgon on Tuesday February 18 2014, @04:53AM

      by Namarrgon (1134) on Tuesday February 18 2014, @04:53AM (#1404)

      Having read the NASA article, it's pretty clear.

      A big solar storm sent a massive amount of infrared radiation our way. The CO2 and NO2 in the thermosphere blocked, absorbed, then re-radiated most of that infrared energy back into space. This is entirely as expected, based on CO2's well-known absorption spectra, and does not change any conclusions about global warming.

      In a nutshell: Greenhouse gases like CO2 block infrared frequencies specifically, but pass most other frequencies through. The majority of normal solar energy is in the visible spectrum [wikipedia.org], which passes unimpeded through our atmosphere and is partially absorbed by the surface. Much of this absorbed energy is re-radiated on infrared frequencies through black-body radiation [wikipedia.org]. Because atmospheric CO2 blocks and reflects infrared, this infrared energy that would have been radiated out into space, is instead returned to the surface, warming the planet further.

      In the case of this solar storm, much of the incoming energy was in the infrared spectrum and was blocked by our CO2 "blanket", which works in both directions.

      --
      Why would anyone engrave Elbereth?