Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.

Global Warming Finally Debunked </sarcasm>

posted by mattie_p on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the conspiracy-or-consensus dept.

AudioGuy writes:

"You heard it here first. According to Natural News, a NASA report has verified that carbon dioxide actually cools the atmosphere.

Practically everything you have been told by the mainstream scientific community and the media about the alleged detriments of greenhouse gases, and particularly carbon dioxide, appears to be false, according to new data compiled by NASA's Langley Research Center. As it turns out, all those atmospheric greenhouse gases that Al Gore and all the other global warming hoaxers have long claimed are overheating and destroying our planet are actually cooling it, based on the latest evidence."

[Ed. note] I'm going to post this, because why not argue science that has been settled? Also, we needed to test the algorithm that generated mod points by sparking conversation. This was as good a way as any to get posts quickly. Sorry if you thought SoylentNews really endorsed this. ~Mattie_p

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Global Warming Finally Debunked </sarcasm> | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 38 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Appalbarry on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:57AM

    by Appalbarry (66) on Sunday February 16 2014, @07:57AM (#224) Journal
    Yeah, like a publication tagged "Natural Health News and Scientific Discoveries" is my go-to source for science reporting..... then again the source [principia-scientific.org] of these claims does admit some minor bias:

    Principia Scientific International (PSI) was originally conceived in 2010 after 22 international climate experts and authors joined forces to write the climate science bestseller, ‘Slaying the Sky Dragon: Death of the Greenhouse Gas Theory.’

    Just because someone says it's science doesn't make it true.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by mrbluze on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:03AM

    by mrbluze (49) on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:03AM (#226) Journal
    That's true, but science in general is in trouble on that front. The number of retracted scientific papers is skyrocketing, and a large proportion of these are due to fraud.
    --
    Do it yourself, 'cause no one else will do it yourself.

    • (Score: 1) by AudioGuy on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:11AM

      by AudioGuy (24) on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:11AM (#227) Journal

      And notice the bias of the editor here, just HAD to put a counter link at the end of me most excellent submission.

      • (Score: 1) by mattie_p on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:16AM

        by mattie_p (13) on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:16AM (#229) Journal
        All editors are biased. I just happen to be biased towards SCIENCE!

        • (Score: 2, Funny) by AudioGuy on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:19AM

          by AudioGuy (24) on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:19AM (#230) Journal

          Admit it, you are just another member of THE AGW CABAL!

          Ruining perfectly good stories.

          • (Score: 1) by janrinok on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:37AM

            by janrinok (52) Subscriber Badge on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:37AM (#233) Journal

            'Ruining perfectly good stories'

            Hardly, in this instance!

            • (Score: 1) by mattie_p on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:38AM

              by mattie_p (13) on Sunday February 16 2014, @08:38AM (#234) Journal

              It was a perfectly ruined story before I ruined it.

              Wait, what?