c0lo writes:
"Following the ban on Tesla direct sale in New Jersey, Elon Musk wrote a message to the people of New Jersey on the Tesla Motor's blog, explaining why they don't want to go through dealers and what will happen next with the stores in New Jersey. To put a context around the issue: Tesla soared in consumer satisfaction, while Ford dropped and it's likely to continue dropping.
The post:
(Score: 2) by bucc5062 on Monday March 17 2014, @03:20PM
No, I did not. The OP makes reference to /. right in the subject line as in ...as Slashdot's. His criticism, not not quite destructive, gave little other then a slightly humorous jab. That was my point. So he points out something he does not like, but gives little back. I point out something I didn't like, but tried to give more understanding. I found his jab witty, but I had hoped he'd talk about the subject a bit. I admitted I was going off topic.
"Headlines are usually supposed to give you some idea of what the story is about." in so many words. "Musk talks to New Jersey?" "Eloy pitches Ideas" "Owner of Tesla suggests New Jer". You only have so many letters and the headline combined elements from the article. Maybe not the best, but not that bad. Sensational? How? Where? Inflammatory? Not even close. Other the Lummox's fau paux the other day I can't really say SN has been that bad compared to /., given that this place is new, editors are new, approach is new. Then, I don't try to figure out the whole submission from just a few words on the front page.
The more things change, the more they look the same