Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday April 15 2015, @10:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the surveillance-stick dept.

ArsTechnica reports that Matt Campbell, a North Little Rock attorney who represents police department whistleblowers supplied an external hard drive to the Fort Smith Police Department for them to copy emails and other evidence. When it was returned, he discovered that it contained three well-known trojan viruses:

According to court documents filed last week in the case, Campbell provided police officials with an external hard drive for them to load with e-mail and other data responding to his discovery request. When he got it back, he found something he didn't request. In a subfolder titled D:\Bales Court Order, a computer security consultant for Campbell allegedly found three well-known trojans, including:

  • Win32:Zbot-AVH[Trj], a password logger and backdoor
  • NSIS:Downloader-CC[Trj], a program that connects to attacker-controlled servers and downloads and installs additional programs, and
  • Two instances of Win32Cycbot-NF[Trj], a backdoor

All three trojans are usually easily detected by antivirus software. In an affidavit filed in the whistle-blower case, Campbell's security consultant said it's unlikely the files were copied to the hard drive by accident, given claims by Fort Smith police that department systems ran real-time AV protection.

"Additionally, the placement of these trojans, all in the same sub-folder and not in the root directory, means that [t]he trojans were not already on the external hard drive that was sent to Mr. Campbell, and were more likely placed in that folder intentionally with the goal of taking command of Mr. Campbell's computer while also stealing passwords to his accounts."

Will the Fort Smith Police Department be held accountable? Place your bets...

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by quadrox on Friday April 17 2015, @06:17AM

    by quadrox (315) on Friday April 17 2015, @06:17AM (#171909)

    It is difficult,s ometimes even impossible, to prove a negative. GGP makes accusations about various logical fallacies without pointing out exactly where these fallacies have occured. Given the fact that the accusation is entirely baseless, should GP have quoted every single sentence with a statement "this is not an ad-hominem, nor circular logic, nor a strawman, nor ..."? That's just dump.

    Instead, the burden of proof lies with GGP, and since he has not seen fit to provide any so far, we may assume it does not exist.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by quadrox on Friday April 17 2015, @06:18AM

    by quadrox (315) on Friday April 17 2015, @06:18AM (#171910)

    Yes yes goddamnit I should have previewed, but when will we get an edit button? Those spelling errors are atrociuous.