Paul Schreiber blogs about the tech behind the websites of presidential candidates. "So, you want to run a country. Can you hire someone who can run a website? ...Here's how the (declared) candidates' sites fare." There's a table comparing 4 candidates' sites based on HTTPS, URL permutations, IPv6, SSL rating, and other related qualities. Schreiber mentions that he will "update this as more candidates declare or sites change."
From the blog comments
HillaryClinton.com was using IIS (and no https) until Sunday morning, when they switched over.
(Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 18 2015, @05:50AM
In the past, there were complaints about not indicating which parts of the original article were lifted intact.
Since then, I have made additional effort to carefully use the blockquote tag.
Undoing the effort I put into my submission takes us back to where we started, months ago.
-- gewg_
(Score: 2) by Yog-Yogguth on Saturday April 18 2015, @03:23PM
No moderation points right now so I'm commenting to give the AC more visibility in case it is needed (I'm not sure it is). Parent comment is “0 Insightful” at the moment.
Bite harder Ouroboros, bite! tails.boum.org/ linux USB CD secure desktop IRC *crypt tor (not endorsements (XKeyScore))